Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436187›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Fungal Biodiversity in Salt Marsh Ecosystems.

Mark S Calabon, E B Gareth Jones, Itthayakorn Promputtha, Kevin D Hyde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A New Genus of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. How Do Fungi Survive in the Sea and Respond to Climate Change?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark S CalabonCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6603-1876
E B Gareth JonesDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Itthayakorn PromputthaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Kevin D HydeCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.

Funding

Thailand Research Fund RDG6130001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review brings together the research efforts on salt marsh fungi, including their geographical distribution and host association. A total of 486 taxa associated with different hosts in salt marsh ecosystems are listed in this review. The taxa belong to three phyla wherein Ascomycota dominates the taxa from salt marsh ecosystems accounting for 95.27% (463 taxa). The Basidiomycota and Mucoromycota constitute 19 taxa and four taxa, respectively. Dothideomycetes has the highest number of taxa, which comprises 47.12% (229 taxa), followed by Sordariomycetes with 167 taxa (34.36%). Pleosporales is the largest order with 178 taxa recorded. Twenty-seven genera under 11 families of halophytes were reviewed for its fungal associates.

Indexed as

halophytesmarine fungimarine mycologysalt marsh fungiworldwide distribution

Identifiers

PMID34436187
PMCPMC8399140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.