Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436116›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Review of Biomaterials and Scaffold Fabrication for Organ-on-a-Chip (OOAC) Systems.

Luana A Osório, Elisabete Silva, Ruth E Mackay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Microfluidic Cochlea-On-A-Chip.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. A Biomimetic Human Multi-Cellular In Vitro Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Contribution of the ELRs to the development of advancedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Reaching the Tumor: Mobility of Polymeric Micelles Inside anACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luana A OsórioDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-5694
Elisabete SilvaDepartment of Life Science, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Ruth E MackayDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6456-6914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug and chemical development along with safety tests rely on the use of numerous clinical models. This is a lengthy process where animal testing is used as a standard for pre-clinical trials. However, these models often fail to represent human physiopathology. This may lead to poor correlation with results from later human clinical trials. Organ-on-a-Chip (OOAC) systems are engineered microfluidic systems, which recapitulate the physiochemical environment of a specific organ by emulating the perfusion and shear stress cellular tissue undergoes in vivo and could replace current animal models. The success of culturing cells and cell-derived tissues within these systems is dependent on the scaffold chosen; hence, scaffolds are critical for the success of OOACs in research. A literature review was conducted looking at current OOAC systems to assess the advantages and disadvantages of different materials and manufacturing techniques used for scaffold production; and the alternatives that could be tailored from the macro tissue engineering research field.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbiomaterialsorgan-on-a-chipscaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34436116
PMCPMC8389238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.