Single-Drop Analysis of Epinephrine and Uric Acid on a Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

A novel, extreme low-cost poly (Erythrosine) modified pencil graphite electrode for determination of Adrenaline.Scientific reports · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David MajerFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-4996

Matjaž FinšgarFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-9284

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P2-0032 and J1-2470

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work demonstrates the analysis of epinephrine (EP) and uric acid (UA) in a single drop (the volume of the test solution was only 50 µL) using a screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) sensor and square-wave voltammetry (SWV). The limit of detection, limit of quantification, linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness were validated. The normality of the experimental data was tested and confirmed for both methods. Heteroscedasticity was checked by residual analysis followed by a statistical

Indexed as

ElectrodesAscorbic AcidBiosensing TechniquesCatalysisElectrochemical TechniquesElectrochemistryEpinephrineHumansNanotubes, CarbonUric AcidAscorbic AcidEpinephrineNanotubes, CarbonUric Acidepinephrinescreen-printed electrodesingle-drop analysisuric acidweighted linear regression

Identifiers

PMID34436086

DOI10.3390/bios11080285

PMCPMC8392267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.