Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436071›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2021

Atrial Fibrillation Prediction from Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.

Syed Khairul Bashar, Eric Y Ding, Allan J Walkey, David D McManus, Ki H Chon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sepsis, Atrial Fibrillation, and Aging: A Dangerous Association.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Syed Khairul BasharBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0180-1980
Eric Y DingDivision of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Allan J WalkeyDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
David D McManusDivision of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Ki H ChonBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4422-4837
University of Connecticut · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBoston University · US

Funding

Automated detection and prediction of atrial fibrillation during sepsisR01HL136660 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI WALKEY, ALLAN J. · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136660NIH HHS R01 HL136660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is defined by life-threatening organ dysfunction during infection and is the leading cause of death in hospitals. During sepsis, there is a high risk that new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) can occur, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, early prediction of AF during sepsis would allow testing of interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent AF and its severe complications. In this paper, we present a novel automated AF prediction algorithm for critically ill sepsis patients using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. From the heart rate signal collected from 5-min ECG, feature extraction is performed using the traditional time, frequency, and nonlinear domain methods. Moreover, variable frequency complex demodulation and tunable Q-factor wavelet-transform-based time-frequency methods are applied to extract novel features from the heart rate signal. Using a selected feature subset, several machine learning classifiers, including support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), were trained using only the 2001 Computers in Cardiology data set. For testing the proposed method, 50 critically ill ICU subjects from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database were used in this study. Using distinct and independent testing data from MIMIC III, the SVM achieved 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 90% accuracy, 100% positive predictive value, and 83.33% negative predictive value for predicting AF immediately prior to the onset of AF, while the RF achieved 88% AF prediction accuracy. When we analyzed how much in advance we can predict AF events in critically ill sepsis patients, the algorithm achieved 80% accuracy for predicting AF events 10 min early. Our algorithm outperformed a state-of-the-art method for predicting AF in ICU patients, further demonstrating the efficacy of our proposed method. The annotations of patients' AF transition information will be made publicly available for other investigators. Our algorithm to predict AF onset is applicable for any ECG modality including patch electrodes and wearables, including Holter, loop recorder, and implantable devices.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicAlgorithmsAtrial FibrillationCritical IllnessElectrocardiographyHumansMachine LearningSepsisSupport Vector MachineWavelet Analysisannotationsatrial fibrillationfeature extractionheart rate variabilitypredictionrandom forestsepsis

Identifiers

PMID34436071
PMCPMC8391773
OpenAlexW3189666424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.