ArticleBiosensors2021
Atrial Fibrillation Prediction from Critically Ill Sepsis Patients.
Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Electrocardiogram Abnormalities with Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Optimizing sepsis mortality prediction using hybrid federated learning and explainable AI framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based early prediction of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias using long-term Holter ECG signals.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sepsis-induced Atrial Fibrillation: Can We Predict and Prevent This High-Risk Complication?Cureus · 2025Review
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Optimizing clinical prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patient: Based on machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Atrial fibrillation is not an independent determinant of 28-day mortality among critically III sepsis patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- Sepsis, Atrial Fibrillation, and Aging: A Dangerous Association.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- A deep learning model for the classification of atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Article
- Article
- External Validation of a Risk Score for Daily Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation among Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022Article
- Machine learning techniques for arrhythmic risk stratification: a review of the literature.International journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for New Episodes of Atrial Fibrillation in Medical-Surgical Critically Ill Patients Using the AmsterdamUMCdb.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Machine learning prediction of atrial fibrillation in cardiovascular patients using cardiac magnetic resonance and electronic health information.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- A two-stage deep learning framework for predicting the onset of Atrial fibrillation using RR interval-based embeddings.Biocybernetics and biomedical engineeringArticle
- Prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis patients by machine learning: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is defined by life-threatening organ dysfunction during infection and is the leading cause of death in hospitals. During sepsis, there is a high risk that new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF) can occur, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, early prediction of AF during sepsis would allow testing of interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent AF and its severe complications. In this paper, we present a novel automated AF prediction algorithm for critically ill sepsis patients using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. From the heart rate signal collected from 5-min ECG, feature extraction is performed using the traditional time, frequency, and nonlinear domain methods. Moreover, variable frequency complex demodulation and tunable Q-factor wavelet-transform-based time-frequency methods are applied to extract novel features from the heart rate signal. Using a selected feature subset, several machine learning classifiers, including support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), were trained using only the 2001 Computers in Cardiology data set. For testing the proposed method, 50 critically ill ICU subjects from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database were used in this study. Using distinct and independent testing data from MIMIC III, the SVM achieved 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 90% accuracy, 100% positive predictive value, and 83.33% negative predictive value for predicting AF immediately prior to the onset of AF, while the RF achieved 88% AF prediction accuracy. When we analyzed how much in advance we can predict AF events in critically ill sepsis patients, the algorithm achieved 80% accuracy for predicting AF events 10 min early. Our algorithm outperformed a state-of-the-art method for predicting AF in ICU patients, further demonstrating the efficacy of our proposed method. The annotations of patients' AF transition information will be made publicly available for other investigators. Our algorithm to predict AF onset is applicable for any ECG modality including patch electrodes and wearables, including Holter, loop recorder, and implantable devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.