Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435967›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Hospital Investment Decisions in Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Framework for Exploring Challenges, Trends, and Research Directions.

Roberto Santiago Vassolo, Alejandro Francisco Mac Cawley, Guilherme Luz Tortorella, Flavio Sanson Fogliatto, Diego Tlapa, Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects of Lean Interventions Supported by Digital Technologies on Healthcare Services: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Digital Transformation in Health Care: Are We on the Right Track?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Health 4.0 in the medical sector: a narrative review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roberto Santiago VassoloIAE Business School, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0870-397X
Alejandro Francisco Mac Cawley *Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-4732
Guilherme Luz TortorellaIAE Business School, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2396-4665
Flavio Sanson FogliattoDepartamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola de Engenharia, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-8060
Diego TlapaFacultad de Ingeniería, Arquitectura y Diseño, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California - Campus Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-5442
Gopalakrishnan NarayanamurthyDepartment of Operations and Supply Chain Management, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3119-5248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature.

objectiveThis study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic.

methodsTo achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio.

resultsOur findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement.

conclusionsSome of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.

Indexed as

TelemedicineBiomedical TechnologyDelivery of Health CareHospitalsHumansTechnologydecision-makersdecision makinghealthcare 4.0health care investmenthealth technologyhealth technology assessmenthospitalhospital managementinvestmentsnew technologiespublic healthreal optionsscoping reviewsmart technologytechnological bundlestechnology

Identifiers

PMID34435967
PMCPMC8430851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.