Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435795›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2021

Development of the Motivational Interviewing Coach Rating Scale (MI-CRS) for health equity implementation contexts.

Sylvie Naar, Jason Chapman, Phillippe B Cunningham, Deborah Ellis, Karen MacDonell, Lisa Todd

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sylvie NaarCenter for Translational Behavioral Science, Florida State University.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-4685
Jason ChapmanOregon Social Learning Center.ORCID 0000-0002-9396-5877
Phillippe B CunninghamDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-2874
Deborah EllisDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
Karen MacDonellDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
Lisa ToddDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-0676

Funding

Scientific Core (ETR)U19HD089875 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NAAR, SYLVIE · 2016 to 2021
$21.4M
Interventionist Procedures for Adherence to Weight Loss Recs in Black AdolescentsU01HL097889 · NHLBI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JEN, KAI-LIN CATHERINE, NAAR, SYLVIE · 2009 to 2013
$5.5M
Development of an MI Implementation Intervention in Adolescent HIV Care SettingsR34MH103049 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MACDONELL, KAREN, NAAR, SYLVIE · 2015 to 2017
$710k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL097889NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD089875NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH103049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe field of implementation science emphasizes efficient and effective fidelity measurement for research outcomes and feedback to support quality improvement. This paper reports on such a measure for motivational interviewing (MI), developed with rigorous methodology and with diverse samples.

methodUsing item response theory (IRT) methods and Rasch modeling, we analyzed coded (a) recordings (n = 99) of intervention sessions in a clinical trial of African American adolescents with obesity; (b) standard patient interactions (n = 370) in an implementation science study with youth living with HIV; and (c) standard patient interactions (n = 172) in a diverse community sample.

resultsThese methods yielded a reliable and valid 12-item scale on several indicators using Rausch modeling including single construct dimensionality, strong item-session maps, good rating scale functionality, and item fit after revisions. However, absolute agreement was modest. The 12 items yielded thresholds for 4 categories: beginner, novice, intermediate and advanced.

conclusionsThe 12-item Motivational Interviewing Coach Rating Scale is the first efficient and effective fidelity measure appropriate with diverse ethnic groups, with interventions that are MI only or interventions that integrate MI with other interventions, and with adolescents and families as well as adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Health EquityImplementation ScienceMotivational InterviewingAdolescentBlack or African AmericanChildFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleObesity

Identifiers

PMID34435795
PMCPMC9634809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.