Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435756›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2021

School allergy training promotes internal policy review and enhances staff's preparedness in managing pupils with food allergy.

George Raptis, Rebecca Totterdell, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Louise Jane Michaelis, Mercedes Perez-Botella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward food allergies among early childhood educators in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Food Allergy Management Competence in Greek Schools.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

George RaptisDepartment of Paediatric Allergy and Immunology, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4358-4635
Rebecca TotterdellDepartment of Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-3984
Konstantinos GerasimidisDepartment of Human Nutrition, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-2200
Louise Jane MichaelisDepartment of Immunology, Infectious Disease & Allergy, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8229-154X
Mercedes Perez-BotellaSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-6446
University of Glasgow · GBGreat North Children's Hospital · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Anaphylaxis Campaign United Kingdom; 98/14/GR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently non-statutory allergy management guidance for schools has been produced in the United Kingdom; however, there has been limited progress in implementing this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of face-to-face training on self-reported school staff preparedness in managing the severely allergic child and whether it would stimulate schools' allergy policy review.

methodsA preparedness survey was conducted prior and 2 months post-intervention to assess the effect of training on self-reported preparedness and perceived confidence to manage children with food allergies.

resultsA sample of 18 primary schools that consented to participate were selected. Of the trained schools, 89% of the head teachers felt confident in dealing with an allergy emergency compared to 39% prior training (p = 0.016). Post-intervention all but one had arranged/were considering introducing allergy awareness sessions to help pupils manage their allergies (45% pre-training vs. post-training 93%, p = 0.003). Preventative measures for accidental exposure to food allergens (i.e., no food sharing policy) were adopted by all (pre-training 61% vs. post-training 100%, p = 0.03).

conclusionA face-to-face school allergy training programme enhances self-reported staff preparedness and promotes internal allergy policy review in managing the needs of these children, hence addressing the current gap between recommendations and practice in schools.

Indexed as

anaphylaxispolicypreparednessschoolstraining

Identifiers

PMID34435756
PMCPMC8451729
OpenAlexW3188010892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.