Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435735›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022

Non-ablative Er:YAG laser is an effective tool in the treatment arsenal of androgenetic alopecia.

Doris Day, Madison McCarthy, Iva Talaber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06292533 (Effectiveness of Ultrapulse for the Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia Among Malaysian), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06292533 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Ultrapulse for the Treatment of Androgenic Alopecia Among Malaysian: A Quasi-experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanRan2024 to 2025Enrolled92ConditionsAndrogenic Alopecia, AlopeciaArmsEr:YAG laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Doris DayDoris Day M.D, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-479X
Madison McCarthyDoris Day M.D, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0570-2864
Iva TalaberLaser and Health Academy, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-4959
Doris Engineering (France) · FRSlovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 70% of the adult population worldwide is affected by androgenetic alopecia (AGA) hair loss. Laser therapy offers an addition or alternative to pharmaceutical and surgical treatment of hair regrowth, with non-ablative lasers being preferred over ablative lasers in terms of safety and downtime. Combining laser therapy with different topical agents may result in better hair regrowth.

objectiveThe aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-ablative Er:YAG laser used in clinical practice, alone or in combination with other treatment modalities, in patients with both early and advanced stages of AGA. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Sixteen patients (7 male and 9 female) with active AGA in different stages were treated with the non-ablative Er:YAG laser (SMOOTH

resultsAGA grade after treatment was lower compared to baseline (p = 0.015 and p = 0.125 in female and male patients, respectively). Blind evaluation indicated an improvement in hair quality in 93% of patients, either being described as much better (14%) or as better (79%), which was not correlated with age or AGA grade. The median satisfaction score was 3, and the median VAS score for pain was 2. The positive effect of the treatment on the hair quality is ongoing. No adverse reactions were reported.

conclusionsThe treatment was effective in treating AGA, confirmed by a decrease in AGA grade and by blinded evaluation of global photographs. Although the possible additive or complementary effect of topical minoxidil or nutraceuticals cannot be excluded, our results suggest that the non-ablative Er:YAG laser SMOOTH

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateMinoxidilAdultAlopeciaFemaleHumansMalePainTreatment OutcomeMinoxidilandrogenetic alopeciacombined therapyhair restorationlaser therapyplatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID34435735
PMCPMC9292628
OpenAlexW3195130341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.