ArticleClinical pharmacology in drug development2022
A Dose-Confirmation Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacology of Glucarpidase in Healthy Volunteers.
Article in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase 2 study of glucarpidase in patients with delayed methotrexate elimination after high-dose methotrexate therapy.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2024Trial
- Development of a population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics model of glucarpidase rescue treatment after high-dose methotrexate therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Development of ZD2767P-carboxypeptidase G2-ultrasound therapy against cisplatin-resistant cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A Dose-Confirmation Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacology of Glucarpidase in Healthy Volunteers.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucarpidase rapidly decomposes methotrexate. A phase 1 study of glucarpidase in an open-label, randomized parallel group was conducted to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and other pharmacologic effects in Japanese healthy volunteers without methotrexate treatment. A dose of 50 U/kg (n = 8) or 20 U/kg (n = 8) of glucarpidase was administered as an intravenous injection, with 1 repeated dose at 48 hours after the first dose. No dose-limiting toxicities, no significant clinical examination findings, and no clinically relevant differences between dose levels were observed. The pharmacokinetic parameters at a first dose of 20 or 50 U/kg were similar to those at a second dose and were as follows: half-life, 7.45 and 7.25 hours; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, 8.25 and 19.05 μg·h/mL; total clearance, 4.85 and 5.47 mL/min; and volume of distribution during the elimination phase, 3.12 and 3.41 L, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve increased in a generally linear dose-proportional manner. An ethnicity specificity in the pharmacokinetic profile was not observed in Japanese volunteers. The serum folate concentration decreased after glucarpidase administration in all the volunteers. The production of anti-glucarpidase antibody was observed in many cases in both cohorts. Although the long-term effect of anti-glucarpidase antibody will need to be investigated in the future, the effects produced by the anti-glucarpidase antibody were not influenced by the pharmacokinetics of glucarpidase within 96 hours after the first dose. The observed safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics support the continued evaluation of glucarpidase in the patients with lethal methotrexate toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.