Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435378›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2021

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for fibrosis improvement and resolution of NASH.

Abdul M Majzoub, Tarek Nayfeh, Abbey Barnard, Nagambika Munaganuru, Shravan Dave, Siddharth Singh, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Rohit Loomba

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Targeting Metabolism: Innovative Therapies for MASLD Unveiled.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abdul M MajzoubDivision of Internal Medicine, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tarek NayfehEvidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abbey BarnardNAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Nagambika MunaganuruNAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Shravan DaveNAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-4926
Siddharth SinghNAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Mohammad Hassan MuradEvidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rohit LoombaNAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4845-9991
University of California San Diego · USMayo Clinic · USConemaugh Health System · US

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
Yeast Genetics and Stress Response Genes-BiomedicalP42ES010337 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TUKEY, ROBERT H · 2000 to 2022
$69.8M
Pediatric Trials in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)U01DK061734 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ROHIT LOOMBA · 2002 to 2026
$24.4M
Tissue-specific roles of FXR in CVD and NASHP01HL147835 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EVANS, RONALD M · 2020 to 2024
$12.2M
San Diego Digestive Diseases Research CenterP30DK120515 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Bernd G. Schnabl · 2019 to 2026
$10.8M
HIV MASLD Clinical Research Network (HCRN)R01DK121378 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI NAGA P CHALASANI, ROHIT LOOMBA · 2020 to 2026
$8.7M
Novel IL-23 inhibitor for the treatment of alcohol associated liver diseaseU01AA029019 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KISSELEVA, TATIANA, LOOMBA, ROHIT · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
QUS Technology for Diagnosis and Grading of Hepatic Steatosis in NAFLDR01DK106419 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LOOMBA, ROHIT, SIRLIN, CLAUDE B · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Non-invasive screening of diabetics for advanced fibrosis due to NAFLDR01DK124318 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LOOMBA, ROHIT · 2020 to 2022
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS 5UL1TR001442NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL147835NHLBI NIH HHS P01HL147835NIAAA NIH HHS U01AA029019NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK120515NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK120515NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106419NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK106419NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121378NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK121378NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124318NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK124318NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061734NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK061734NIEHS NIH HHS 5P42ES010337NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of chronic liver disease. There is a major need to understand the efficacy of different pharmacological agents for the treatment of NASH.

aimTo assess the relative rank-order of different pharmacological interventions in fibrosis improvement and NASH resolution.

methodsA comprehensive search of several databases was conducted by an experienced librarian. We included randomised controlled-trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions in patients with biopsy-proven NASH. The primary outcome was ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis. The secondary outcome was NASH resolution.

resultsA total of 26 RCTs with 23 interventions met the eligibility criteria. Lanifibranor and obeticholic acid had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement (SUCRA 0.78) and (SUCRA 0.77), respectively. For NASH resolution, semaglutide, liraglutide and vitamin E plus pioglitazone had the highest probability of being ranked the most effective intervention for achieving NASH resolution (SUCRA 0.89), (SUCRA 0.84) and (SUCRA 0.83), respectively. Lanifibranor, obeticholic acid, pioglitazone and vitamin E were significantly better than placebo in achieving ≥1 stage of fibrosis improvement. Conversely, semaglutide, liraglutide, vitamine E plus pioglitazone, pioglitazone, lanifibranor and obeticholic acid were significantly better than placebo in achieving NASH resolution.

conclusionThese data provide relative rank-order efficacy of various NASH therapies in terms of their improvements in liver fibrosis and NASH resolution. Therapies that have been shown to improve NASH resolution may be combined with therapies that have an antifibrotic effect to further boost treatment response rate in future.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiopsyHumansLiver CirrhosisPioglitazoneVitamin EPioglitazoneVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID34435378
PMCPMC8711247
OpenAlexW3193811807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.