ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2021
Bladder augmentation from an insider's perspective: a review of the literature on microcirculatory studies.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Augmentation cystoplasty is an exemplary multiorgan intervention in urology which is particularly associated with microvascular damage. Our aim was to review the available intravital imaging techniques and data obtained from clinical and experimental microcirculatory studies involving the most important donor organs applied in bladder augmentation. Although numerous direct or indirect methods are available to assess the condition of microvessels the implementation of microcirculatory diagnostic methods in humans is still challenging and the assessment of organ microcirculation in the operating theatre has limitations. Nevertheless, preclinical studies generally report good internal validity and although prospective human protocols with reduced variability are needed, a possible positive impact of microcirculatory diagnostics on the clinical outcomes of urologic surgery can be anticipated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.