Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435269›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2022

An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Ted B Walker, Tricia A Hengehold, Kevin Garza, Benjamin D Rogers, Dayna Early

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07229066 (Evaluation of the Effect of Video-Based Education on Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07229066 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effect of Video-Based Education on Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled246ConditionsBowel Preparation Quality, Colonoscopy, Patient EducationArmsVideo Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Patient-reported outcomes and measures applied in individuals undergoing colonoscopy surveillance for colorectal cancer: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Racial Differences in Colorectal Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ted B WalkerDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus, Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1227-8379
Tricia A HengeholdDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus, Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Kevin GarzaDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus, Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Benjamin D RogersDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus, Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Dayna EarlyDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus, Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. dearly@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsInadequate bowel preparation leads to poor outcomes in colonoscopy. Prior investigations have demonstrated improved bowel preparation with pre-procedural educational videos. We aimed to determine whether an interactive, online educational video could improve bowel preparation scores in an outpatient population.

methodsWe performed a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial at our hospital-based outpatient endoscopy center. Eligible patients were randomized to two groups. Both groups received standard verbal and written instructions, while the intervention group also received access to an interactive, online video. The primary outcome was improvement in the bowel preparation scores graded using the Boston bowel prep score (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate, total number of polyps detected, patient satisfaction, pre-procedure anxiety, and complication rates.

resultsThe difference in BBPS in the intervention group (8) compared to the control group (7.6) did not meet statistical significance in our primary outcome of improvement in BBPS (p = 0.076). However, on subgroup analysis, there was a statistically significant improvement in BBPS in the intervention group among African Americans (p = 0.007) and patients older than 65 (p = 0.026). Those in the intervention arm rated pre-procedural materials "very easy" to understand significantly more often than in the control arm (p = 0.018).

conclusionsUse of an interactive, online educational video for bowel preparation did not lead to improvement in overall BBPS. However, among patients at higher risk for inadequate bowel preparation, such as African Americans and elderly patients, there may be a benefit.

Indexed as

AdenomaSimulation TrainingAgedCatharticsColonoscopyHumansProspective StudiesResearch DesignCatharticsBowel preparationColorectal cancer screeningEnhanced instructionQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34435269
OpenAlexW3193748576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.