Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435239›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Development of a Remote Examination of Deglutition Based on Consensus Surveys of Clinicians (Part I): Selection of Examination Items.

Fumitaka Omori, Masako Fujiu-Kurachi, Kiyoko Iiboshi, Takafumi Yamano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fumitaka OmoriDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Fukuoka Dental College Hospital, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan. fohmori0221@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-6423
Masako Fujiu-KurachiDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, 4-3 Kouzunomori, Narita-shi, Tsiba, 286-8686, Japan.
Kiyoko IiboshiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shigakukan University, 59-1 Murasakibaru, Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, 890-8504, Japan.
Takafumi YamanoSection of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Medicine, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1 Tamura, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan.
International University of Health and Welfare · JPFukuoka Dental College · JPShigakukan University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to ensure appropriateness and feasibility of examination items for remote evaluation for deglutition disorders, a questionnaire based on the Delphi method was administered to 122 speech-language-hearing therapists (STs), and a set of examination items was selected. The participants were instructed to view a video recording of a remote assessment situation and answer a 30-item questionnaire. Of 19 items ensuring the appropriateness for deglutition disorders detection, 13 items ultimately met the consensus criteria for remote feasibility. Factor analysis extracted three factors: 'oral observation,' 'overall evaluation,' and 'perceptual voice judgment.' In free-text responses, "quality and stability of the voice that may be heard through the device" were the most common concerns, followed by "the need to correct of the camera angle, magnification, and targets that should be projected," "concerns about the technical aspects of the assistants and their role in relation with the examiner/ST," and "the need for palpation as well as visual confirmation." The proposed 13-item examination is considered to capture the characteristics of deglutition disorders, while items that appeared difficult to implement remotely were excluded. The fact that some items could be influenced by the video calling experience when judging the feasibility of remote implementation, the acceptability of such items, is likely to increase in the future.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo RecordingDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDelphi surveyRemote evaluationSpeech–language–hearing therapist

Identifiers

PMID34435239
PMCPMC8386680
OpenAlexW3195711214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.