Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435166›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2021

The Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections on Stricture Formation, Leakage Rates, Esophageal Elongation, and Anastomotic Healing Following Primary Anastomosis in a Long- and Short-Gap Esophageal Atresia Model - A Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Trial in Pigs.

Emma Svensson, Peter Zvara, Niels Qvist, Lars Hagander, Sören Möller, Lars Rasmussen, Henrik Daa Schrøder, Eva Kildall Hejbøl, Niels Bjørn, Súsanna Petersen and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Emma SvenssonPediatric surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University. Skane University Hospital Lund, 221 84 Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-3276
Peter ZvaraResearch Unit for Urology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-6980
Niels QvistResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1113-195X
Lars HaganderPediatric surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University. Skane University Hospital Lund, 221 84 Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-4613
Sören MöllerOPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0858-4269
Lars RasmussenResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2577-2731
Henrik Daa SchrøderDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 15, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-235X
Eva Kildall HejbølDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 15, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-321X
Niels BjørnResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-8501
Súsanna PetersenResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Kristine Cederstrøm LarsenResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8592-4645
Jan KrhutDepartment of Surgical Studies, Medical Faculty, Ostrava University, Syllabova 19, 703 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-5926
Oliver J MuenstererDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-4395
Mark Bremholm EllebækResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-7505
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital malformation affecting 1:3000-4500 newborns. Approximately 15% have a long-gap EA (LGEA), in which case a primary anastomosis is often impossible to achieve. To create continuity of the esophagus patients instead have to undergo lengthening procedures or organ interpositions; methods associated with high morbidity and poor functional outcomes. Esophageal injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) could enable primary anastomosis and mitigate stricture formation through decreased tissue tension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomized controlled blinded animal trial, 24 pigs are divided into a long- or short-gap EA group (LGEA and SGEA, respectively) and randomized to receive BTX-A or isotonic saline injections. In the LGEA group, injections are given endoscopically in the esophageal musculature. After seven days, a 3 cm esophageal resection and primary anastomosis is performed. In the SGEA group, a 1 cm esophageal resection and primary anastomosis is performed, followed by intraoperative injections of BTX-A or isotonic saline. After 14 days, stricture formation, presence of leakage, and esophageal compliance is assessed using endoscopic and manometric techniques, and in vivo and ex vivo contrast radiography. Tissue elongation is evaluated in a stretch-tension test, and the esophagus is assessed histologically to evaluate anastomotic healing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study complies with the ARRIVE guidelines for animal studies and has been approved by the Danish Animal Experimentation Council. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. HIGHLIGHTS: The optimal management of long-gap esophageal atresia remains controversialPrimary anastomosis could improve functional outcomes and reduce complicationsBotulinum Toxin Type A decreases tissue tension and could facilitate anastomosisReduced tension could further abate the risk for anastomotic stricture and leakageWe present a model to evaluate the method in long- and short-gap esophageal atresia.

Indexed as

anastomotic stricturebotulinum toxinoesophageal atresia

Identifiers

PMID34435166
PMCPMC8362621
OpenAlexW3189834263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.