Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34435145›Full record

ReviewSpine surgery and related research2021

Paracoccygeal Transsacral Approach: A Rare Approach for Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion.

Brian Fiani, Imran Siddiqi, Daniel Chacon, Ryan Arthur Figueras, Preston Rippe, Michael Kortz, Juliana Runnels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Spine surgery and related research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian FianiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Imran SiddiqiCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Daniel ChaconSchool of Medicine, Ross University, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Ryan Arthur FiguerasSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA.
Preston RippeKentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, USA.
Michael KortzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
Juliana RunnelsSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations.

Indexed as

AxiaLIFAxial lumbosacral interbody fusionLumbar interbody fusionParacoccygealTranssacral

Identifiers

PMID34435145
PMCPMC8356233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.