Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434901›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2021

Fungal Pathogens in Grasslands.

Anuruddha Karunarathna, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Ruvishika S Jayawardena, Chandrika Nanayakkara, Suhail Asad, Jianchu Xu, Kevin D Hyde, Samantha C Karunarathna, Steven L Stephenson, Saisamorn Lumyong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Two new species ofMycoKeys · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Anuruddha KarunarathnaCentre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming, China.
Saowaluck TibprommaCentre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming, China.
Ruvishika S JayawardenaCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Chandrika NanayakkaraDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Suhail AsadState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Jianchu XuCentre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming, China.
Kevin D HydeCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Samantha C KarunarathnaCentre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming, China.
Steven L StephensonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Saisamorn LumyongResearch Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Jaturong KumlaResearch Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THMae Fah Luang University · THWorld Agroforestry Centre · KEKunming Institute of Botany · CNThe Royal College Of Anesthesiologists Of Thailand · THUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Colombo · LKYunnan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasslands are major primary producers and function as major components of important watersheds. Although a concise definition of grasslands cannot be given using a physiognomic or structural approach, grasslands can be described as vegetation communities experiencing periodical droughts and with canopies dominated by grasses and grass-like plants. Grasslands have a cosmopolitan distribution except for the Antarctic region. Fungal interactions with grasses can be pathogenic or symbiotic. Herbivorous mammals, insects, other grassland animals, and fungal pathogens are known to play important roles in maintaining the biomass and biodiversity of grasslands. Although most pathogenicity studies on the members of Poaceae have been focused on economically important crops, the plant-fungal pathogenic interactions involved can extend to the full range of ecological circumstances that exist in nature. Hence, it is important to delineate the fungal pathogen communities and their interactions in man-made monoculture systems and highly diverse natural ecosystems. A better understanding of the key fungal players can be achieved by combining modern techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) together with studies involving classic phytopathology, taxonomy, and phylogeny. It is of utmost importance to develop experimental designs that account for the ecological complexity of the relationships between grasses and fungi, both above and below ground. In grasslands, loss in species diversity increases interactions such as herbivory, mutualism, predation or infectious disease transmission. Host species density and the presence of heterospecific host species, also affect the disease dynamics in grasslands. Many studies have shown that lower species diversity increases the severity as well as the transmission rate of fungal diseases. Moreover, communities that were once highly diverse but have experienced decreased species richness and dominancy have also shown higher pathogenicity load due to the relaxed competition, although this effect is lower in natural communities. This review addresses the taxonomy, phylogeny, and ecology of grassland fungal pathogens and their interactions in grassland ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemGrasslandAnimalsBiodiversityFungiHumansSoil MicrobiologyAscomycetesfoliar diseasesgraminicolous fungigrassland ecologyhuman and plant diseasephytopathogenssoil-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID34434901
PMCPMC8381356
OpenAlexW3188209471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.