Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434856›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2021

Experimental protocol for detecting higher alcohol consumers from a conventional rat line based on basal anxiety.

Priscila Vázquez-León, Abraham Miranda-Páez, Bruno A Marichal-Cancino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Priscila Vázquez-LeónDepartamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Ciudad Universitaria, 20131 Aguascalientes, Ags., México.
Abraham Miranda-PáezDepartamento de Fisiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Wilfrido Massieu esq. Manuel Stampa s/n Col. Nueva Industrial Vallejo CP: 07738; Alc. Gustavo A. Madero, México City, Mexico.
Bruno A Marichal-CancinoDepartamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Ciudad Universitaria, 20131 Aguascalientes, Ags., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predisposition for a high alcohol intake and the impact of alcohol-abstinence-relapse may be reliable experimentally performed in conventional adult rat lines if animals received juvenile exposure to alcohol (e.g., by forced consumption) and selecting those individuals with high basal anxiety levels during juvenile periods. Importantly, a forced alcohol consumption phase must be followed by an imposed withdrawal period to form an exposure-abstinence cycle (at least two cycles are required) which allow to obtain animals with notorious alcohol relapses. The easier way to test alcohol relapses is through voluntary ethanol intake models. On the other hand, the anxiety classification may be performance by classical paradigms such as an elevated plus maze test, defensive burying behavior test or any other. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol description to detect higher alcohol consumers animals from male Wistar rats. This protocol should be especially useful for those interested in studying the participation of specific brain nucleus [e.g., periaqueductal gray (PAG)] and/or the neurotransmitters involved [e.g., neuropeptide Y (NPY)] in the alcohol intake phenomena if it is combined with stereotaxic surgery. However, every administration route of treatments or experimental design is appropriate; the limit is the own imagination, and the resources.

Indexed as

AlcoholAnxietyDefensive buryingDrug intakeElevated plus-mazeRelapse

Identifiers

PMID34434856
PMCPMC8374696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.