Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434765›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2021

Optimization of a new selective pressurized liquid extraction methodology for determining organic pollutants in wild boar livers.

Xiana González-Gómez, Noelia Cambeiro-Pérez, María Figueiredo-González, Elena Martínez-Carballo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiana González-GómezUniversidade de Vigo, Campus da Auga, Analytical and Food Chemistry Department, Facultade de Ciencias 32004, Ourense, Spain.
Noelia Cambeiro-PérezUniversidade de Vigo, Campus da Auga, Analytical and Food Chemistry Department, Facultade de Ciencias 32004, Ourense, Spain.
María Figueiredo-GonzálezUniversidade de Vigo, Campus da Auga, Analytical and Food Chemistry Department, Facultade de Ciencias 32004, Ourense, Spain.
Elena Martínez-CarballoUniversidade de Vigo, Campus da Auga, Analytical and Food Chemistry Department, Facultade de Ciencias 32004, Ourense, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a new selective pressurised liquid extraction (SPLE) methodology was optimised for determining about 70 organic pollutants (OPs) including organochlorine (OCPs), organophosphate (OPPs) and pyrethroid (PYRs) pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybromodiphenyl ethers (PBDEs), as well as, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in wild boar liver samples considering the temperature, pressure and time of contact between the solvent and the matrix as influential variables. Clean-up of extracts was performed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) using EZ-POP cartridges. Detection of OPs was carried out by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (QqQ-MS/MS). This new approach offers:•A new non-time consuming SPLE methodology for determining about 70 OPs in wild boar.•Recoveries achieved ranged between 74 to 119 % with RSD less than 20 %.•Detection and quantification limits in the low to mid pg/g range.

Indexed as

GC-QqQ-MS/MSOrganic pollutantsSelective pressurized liquid extractionWild boar livers

Identifiers

PMID34434765
PMCPMC8374156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.