Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434568›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2021

PSMA PET/CT to evaluate response to SBRT for prostate cancer bone metastases.

Igor Sadetski, Yael Eshet, Orit Kaidar-Person, Uri Amit, Liran Domachevsky, Tima Davidson, Ilana Weiss, Maoz Ben Ayun, Zvi Symon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolic response after 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-directed IGRT/SBRT for oligometastases prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Igor SadetskiRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Yael EshetNuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Orit Kaidar-PersonRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-1869
Uri AmitRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Liran DomachevskyNuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Tima DavidsonNuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Ilana WeissRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Maoz Ben AyunRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Zvi SymonRadiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the current study we evaluated MATERIALS AND

methodsAfter the institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of medical records of consecutive prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2018 was conducted. Only medical records of patients that were treated with SBRT for bone metastasis and had pre-and post-SBRT

resultsDuring the study period, a total of 12 patients (15 lesions) were included, with a median age of 73 years. The median follow-up was 26.5 months (range 13-45 months). Median time of

conclusionsSBRT is a highly effective and safe method for treatment of prostate cancer bone metastases. More studies are required to determine if SBRT provides greater clinical benefit than standard fractionation for oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancerPETprostatePSMAradiationSBRTstereotactic

Identifiers

PMID34434568
PMCPMC8382074
OpenAlexW3156230393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.