Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434557›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2021

Time to blood, respiratory and urine culture positivity in the intensive care unit: Implications for de-escalation.

Lindsey A Sellers, Kathryn M Fitton, Margaret F Segovia, Christy C Forehand, Kevin K Dobbin, Andrea Sikora Newsome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsey A SellersDepartment of Pharmacy, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8653-6185
Kathryn M FittonUniversity of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-8869
Margaret F SegoviaJames A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christy C ForehandDepartment of Pharmacy, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Kevin K DobbinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Andrea Sikora NewsomeDepartment of Pharmacy, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2020-0571

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConcern for late detection of bacterial pathogens is a barrier to early de-escalation efforts. The purpose of this study was to assess blood, respiratory and urine culture results at 72 h to test the hypothesis that early negative culture results have a clinically meaningful negative predictive value.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit between March 2012 and July 2018 with blood cultures obtained. Blood, respiratory and urine culture results were assessed for time to positivity, defined as the time between culture collection and preliminary species identification. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value of negative blood culture results at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of blood, respiratory and urine culture results.

resultsThe analysis included 1567 blood, 514 respiratory and 1059 urine cultures. Of the blood, respiratory and urine cultures ultimately positive, 90.3%, 76.2% and 90.4% were positive at 72 h. The negative predictive value of negative 72-h blood, respiratory and urine cultures were 0.99, 0.82 and 0.97, respectively. Antibiotic de-escalation had good specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for finalized negative cultures.

conclusionNegative blood and urine culture results at 72 h had a high negative predictive value. These findings have important ramifications for antimicrobial stewardship efforts and support protocolized re-evaluation of empiric antibiotic therapy at 72 h. Caution should be used in patients with clinically suspected pneumonia, since negative respiratory culture results at 72 h were weakly predictive of finalized negative cultures.

Indexed as

blood culturesCritical care/emergency medicinede-escalationinfectious diseases antimicrobial stewardshiptime to positivity

Identifiers

PMID34434557
PMCPMC8381457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.