ArticleJournal of medical cases2020
Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 in a Woman Without Simultaneous Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasm.
Article in Journal of medical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 5-aminolevulinic acid induced photodynamic reactions in diagnosis and therapy for female lower genital tract diseases.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Relationship between HPV-16 infection and the progression of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the presence of the uterus, it is rare that vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) alone exists. We described our experience with a case in which VAIN3 was found in the vaginal fornix without lesions in the uterine cervix. She had cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) 1 several years ago. After that, it disappeared. However, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion persisted cytologically. After hysterectomy was performed, VAIN3 was found in the vaginal fornix. CIN was not found in the cervix. We are apt to suspect endocervical lesions when Papanicolau (Pap) smear shows abnormalities and colposcopy fails to identify columnar epithelium. However, we need to keep in mind that the vaginal fornix may have a lesion. It may be difficult to assess the vaginal fornix in young women because of a large cervix. The presence of VAIN should also be considered when cytological abnormalities persist on Pap smears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.