ArticleJournal of medical cases2020
A Cervical Smear Scare due to Monsel's Solution: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of medical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monsel's solution has been in use since the end of the 19th century for its valuable property of creating hemostasis in minor disruptions of the epithelium. Its styptic effect was first described by Leon Monsel, a pharmacist in the French army, in a letter dated on October 13, 1852. Containing ferric subsulphate, it is used as a topical hemostatic agent in minor procedures such as biopsies in gynecology, proctology, dermatology, otorhinolaryngology and odontology. A 28-year-old nulliparous woman, with a known history of adenomyosis, had presented for sudden heavy intermenstrual vaginal bleeding. Examination revealed a bleeding Nabothian cyst. Monsel's solution application helped stop the bleeding. She returned 3 days later with persistent heavy vaginal bleeding. Examination showed active oozing from the Nabothian cyst. A cervical smear and a human papillomavirus (HPV) swab were taken, and vaginal packing was inserted. The cervical smear result was reported as atypical cells, suspicious for malignancy. Colposcopy performed showed a grade 2 acetowhite lesion, suspicious for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III/microinvasive disease. However, punch biopsies of the cervix revealed only CIN I/koilocytosis. The patient was counselled and subsequently underwent a laser cone biopsy, which showed CIN I with clear margins. The discrepant results between the cervical smear and the cone biopsy prompted a review of the cervical smear and cervical histology; and a relook at the chronology of events. The cytological features observed in the initial cervical smear could be explained by the interference from the Monsel's solution, which was applied just 3 days before the cervical smear. In cases where Monsel's solution has been used for hemostasis, it is best to delay taking a cervical smear or a biopsy for at least 3 weeks as the histologic effect of Monsel's solution may persist for up to that duration of time in tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.