ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Role and dynamics of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 in burn patients.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Protein Supplementation Enhances Wound Healing and Reduces Complications Following Abdominoplasty: A Controlled Study in Non-bariatric Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Observational
- Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and 3 (TIMP-3) as New Markers of Acute Kidney Injury After Massive Burns.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Effect of Combining Immersion Therapy with Shengji Ointment on Wound Healing Rate and Adverse Reaction Rate in Patients with Second-Degree Burn.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Identification and Verification of Five Potential Biomarkers Related to Skin and Thermal Injury Using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injuries can trigger tissue changes that can explain the variation in the level of different biochemical markers that can be recorded both locally or systemically. Some events observed in burn wounds such as vascular hyperpermeability have been associated with the release of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) after trauma. Because it is unknown whether the serum levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 are a consequence of these destructions or a local response to thermal damage, we decided to follow their dynamics. Twenty-five patients (mean age 49.40±17.55 years) with a total body surface area (TBSA) affected by a thermal burn of <25% and 30 healthy subjects (mean age 49.70±8.04 years) were enrolled in the present study. Enzyme immunoassays were used to measure the serum levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1. Our results showed that MMP-9 was increased 6.25-fold immediately after injury compared to the controls and remained on a plateau throughout the 7-day monitoring period. TIMP-1 showed an upward trend with an increase of 49.52% on the seventh day after triggering insult. The time-course of the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio followed the inverse dynamics of TIMP-1 starting from a ratio value measured at admission 3.82-fold higher than the one observed in the healthy volunteers and a highly statistically significant correlation between the values measured at different time-points during the monitoring period (P<0.001). The results of this retrospective study indicate that the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio may provide information on local changes over time, starting from the triggering insult, and may be considered as a predictive biomarker of burn evolutivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.