Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2021

Deficit of Inhibition as a Marker of Neuroplasticity (DEFINE Study) in Rehabilitation: A Longitudinal Cohort Study Protocol.

Marcel Simis, Marta Imamura, Paulo Sampaio de Melo, Anna Marduy, Linamara Battistella, Felipe Fregni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TMS-Indexed neurophysiological signatures of neural compensation in spinal cord injury: associations with injury level, motor function, and affective modulation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Editorial - Seeking Brain Homeostatic Compensatory Mechanisms for Pain Control.Principles and practice of clinical research (2015) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcel SimisNúcleo de Estudos Avançados em Reabilitação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marta ImamuraNúcleo de Estudos Avançados em Reabilitação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Sampaio de MeloNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Anna MarduyNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Linamara BattistellaNúcleo de Estudos Avançados em Reabilitação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe FregniNeuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

amputationbiomarkersbrain plasticitydisabilityneuronal plasticityosteoarthritisspinal cord injurystroke

Identifiers

PMID34434160
PMCPMC8380986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.