Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34434050›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2021

COVID-19 Prevention Practices and Associated Factors Among Frontline Community Health Workers in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.

Tadesse Gebremedhin, Habtamu Abebe, Wondimagegn Wondimu, Abraham Tamirat Gizaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health care workers in Latin America.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tadesse GebremedhinDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-8802
Habtamu AbebeDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-0782
Wondimagegn WondimuMizan-Tepi University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-4438-6542
Abraham Tamirat GizawDepartment of Health Behaviour and Society, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-4454
Jimma University · ETMizan Tepi University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA timely understanding of the frontline community health care workers' prevention practices towards COVID-19 is very crucial to combat the pandemic. Despite this, no study has been conducted among frontline community health workers in Africa, particularly in Ethiopia. The study aimed to determine the status of implementation of preventive measures of frontline community health care workers towards COVID-19 and its associated factors.

methodsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 421 health extension workers among selected districts. Data were collected using a pretested structured questionnaire adapted from different pieces of literature. Respondents who scored above mean score on the item measurement such as knowledge, attitude, and practice questions were categorized as knowledgeable, having positive attitude, and having good prevention practices, respectively. Data were entered in EpiData 3.1 and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 software. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify significant predictors. P- values less than or equal to 0.05 were declared as statistically significant.

resultsThe mean age of study participants was 31.35 years (±4.83 SD), and almost half (217; 51.54%) of respondents were single and 273 (62.47%) were trained for COVID-19 prevention measures. Of the total study subjects, 194 (46.08%; 95% CI=41.6-50.7%) had good prevention practices towards COVID-19. Being married (AOR=3.36, 95% CI=2.20-5.13), being trained (AOR=2.28, 95% CI=1.39-3.74), having good knowledge (AOR=2.4, 95% CI=1.52-3.99), and having positive attitude towards COVID-19 prevention measures (AOR=5.88, 95% CI=3.52-9.80) increase the likelihood of implementing prevention measures.

conclusionThis study showed that prevention status was low; therefore, government and non-governmental organizations working around the study area should emphasize providing training to increase their level of knowledge and to change the attitude towards implementation of prevention measures, and these can ultimately increase the status of prevention practices.

Indexed as

frontline community health workersprevention practices

Identifiers

PMID34434050
PMCPMC8380630
OpenAlexW3196110300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.