ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2021
Interleukin-1β activity in gingival crevicular fluid of abutment teeth with temporary fixed restorations versus final fixed restorations: Prospective observational study.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytokines profile in gingival crevicular fluid of subjects wearing fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2024Pooled it
- Research progress of biomimetic materials in oral medicine.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- The Influence of Fixed Dental Prostheses on the Expression of Inflammatory Markers and Periodontal Status-Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Potential Impact of Prosthetic Biomaterials on the Periodontium: A Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cytotoxicity and Bonding Property of Bioinspired Nacre-like Ceramic-Polymer Composites.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effect of temporary fixed restorations to final fixed restorations on gingival health of abutment tooth by evaluating the level of IL-1β in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) as an inflammatory biomarker. SUBJECTS AND
methodsIt was a nonrandomized prospective observational study. Samples of GCF were collected from 24 participants with provisional and permanent definitive full-coverage restorations with subgingival margin placements at three intervals for each participant: Interval 1, after preparation and immediately before cementation of temporary fixed restoration. Interval 2, after two weeks of temporization and before receiving the final fixed restoration. Interval 3, after two weeks of final fixed restorations. GCF were collected from gingival crevice of the abutment tooth by pre-prepared filter paper with dimensions of 2mmx13mm. They were prepared for IL-1β concentration assay by enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay - analysis (ELIZA).
resultsWere analyzed by SAS® software, Descriptive means and medians were used and the repeated ANVOA test was applied (1st interval) showed the highest level of IL-β (13.587 ± 5.735). In 2nd interval the level of IL-β was significantly reduced (9.602 ± 3.279). While, in 3rd interval the level of IL-β was the lowest (6.293 ± 3.279).
conclusionThe material and technique of fabrication of both temporary and final fixed restorations are critical for gingival health. PMMA CAD-CAM based temporary restorations showed to be compatible to gingival health by decreasing the level of IL-β level, but the zirconia as a final fixed restoration showed to have optimum compatible effect on gingival health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.