Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433961›Full record

ArticleNature2021

A Triassic stem lepidosaur illuminates the origin of lizard-like reptiles.

Ricardo N Martínez, Tiago R Simões, Gabriela Sobral, Sebastián Apesteguía

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Late TriassicRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The affinities of the Late TriassicRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ontogenetic variation in the cranium ofSwiss journal of palaeontology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Triassic crown squamate.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ricardo N MartínezInstituto y Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Centro de Investigaciones de la Geósfera y la Biósfera, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina. martinez@unsj.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6013-1139
Tiago R SimõesDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. tsimoes@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-649X
Gabriela SobralDepartment of Palaeontology, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5001-4406
Sebastián ApesteguíaÁrea de Paleontología, Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Harvard University · USNational University of San Juan · ARStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart · DEUniversidad Maimónides · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early evolution of diapsid reptiles is marked by a deep contrast between our knowledge of the origin and early evolution of archosauromorphs (crocodiles, avian and non-avian dinosaurs) to that of lepidosauromorphs (squamates (lizards, snakes) and sphenodontians (tuataras)). Whereas the former include hundreds of fossil species across various lineages during the Triassic period

Indexed as

DinosaursFossilsLizardsPhylogenyAnimalsArgentinaBayes TheoremPhylogeographySkullX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID34433961
OpenAlexW3194524199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.