Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433919›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2021

mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation.

Namit Chaudhary, Drew Weissman, Kathryn A Whitehead

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 777 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
777citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

777 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Recoding by NNature communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

717 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Namit ChaudharyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2115-7731
Drew WeissmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathryn A WhiteheadDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. kawhite@cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0100-7824

Funding

Fate, Function and Genetic Engineering of Breast Milk Cells for Infant TherapyDP2HD098860 · NICHD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI WHITEHEAD, KATHRYN A. · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD098860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several decades, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines have progressed from a scepticism-inducing idea to clinical reality. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic catalysed the most rapid vaccine development in history, with mRNA vaccines at the forefront of those efforts. Although it is now clear that mRNA vaccines can rapidly and safely protect patients from infectious disease, additional research is required to optimize mRNA design, intracellular delivery and applications beyond SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis. In this Review, we describe the technologies that underlie mRNA vaccines, with an emphasis on lipid nanoparticles and other non-viral delivery vehicles. We also overview the pipeline of mRNA vaccines against various infectious disease pathogens and discuss key questions for the future application of this breakthrough vaccine platform.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlVaccines, SyntheticClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug DesignDrug DevelopmentHumansmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2mRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID34433919
PMCPMC8386155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.