Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433652›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Intratumoral Delivery of STING Agonist Results in Clinical Responses in Canine Glioblastoma.

C Elizabeth Boudreau, Hinda Najem, Martina Ott, Craig Horbinski, Dexing Fang, Chase M DeRay, Jonathan M Levine, Michael A Curran, Amy B Heimberger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. cGAS-agonistic spherical nucleic acids reprogram the glioblastoma immune microenvironment and promote antitumor immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma.Cancer treatment and research · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C Elizabeth BoudreauDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. amy.heimberger@northwestern.edu bboudreau@cvm.tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7867-1555
Hinda NajemDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-4432-9708
Martina OttMiltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.
Craig HorbinskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Dexing FangDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Chase M DeRayDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9657-1307
Jonathan M LevineDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Michael A CurranDepartment of Melanoma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. amy.heimberger@northwestern.edu bboudreau@cvm.tamu.edu.
Northwestern University · USTexas College · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMiltenyi Biotec (Germany) · DE

Funding

Stinging the Glioma Immune LandscapeR01NS120547 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, ARVIND · 2020 to 2023
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeActivation of STING ( PATIENTS AND

methodsA small-molecule STING agonist, IACS-8779, was stereotactically administered using intraoperative navigation intratumorally in dogs with spontaneously arising glioblastoma. The phase I trial used an escalating dose design, ascending through four dose levels (5-20 μg). Treatment was repeated every 4-6 weeks for a minimum of two cycles. Radiographic response to treatment was determined by response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria applied to isovoxel postcontrast T1-weighted MR images obtained on a single 3T magnet.

resultsSix dogs were enrolled and completed ≥1 cycle of treatment. One dog was determined to have an abscess and was removed from further analysis. One procedure-related fatality was observed. Radiographic responses were dose dependent after the first cycle. The first subject had progressive disease, whereas there was 25% volumetric reduction in one subject and greater than 50% in the remaining surviving subjects. The median progression-free survival time was 14 weeks (range: 0-22 weeks), and the median overall survival time was 32 weeks (range: 11-39 weeks).

conclusionsIntratumoral STING agonist (IACS-8779) administration was well tolerated in dogs with glioblastoma to a dose of 15 μg. Higher doses of IACS-8779 were associated with radiographic responses.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAnimalsDogsFemaleInjections, IntralesionalInterferonsPyrimidinesSulfur CompoundsTreatment OutcomeIACS-8779InterferonsPyrimidinesSulfur Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34433652
PMCPMC8989401
OpenAlexW3194080947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.