Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433598›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

eHBB: a randomised controlled trial of virtual reality or video for neonatal resuscitation refresher training in healthcare workers in resource-scarce settings.

Rachel Umoren, Sherri Bucher, Daniel S Hippe, Beatrice Nkolika Ezenwa, Iretiola Bamikeolu Fajolu, Felicitas M Okwako, John Feltner, Mary Nafula, Annet Musale, Olubukola A Olawuyi and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06956833 (Self-Guided Versus Facilitator-Guided Debriefing in Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06956833 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Self-Guided Versus Facilitator-Guided Debriefing in Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial As-sessing Teamwork Skills in Medical Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2025 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsVirtual Reality Simulation, Simulation-based Medical Education, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Immersive Virtual RealityArmsÌmmersive virtual reality simulation with self-guided debriefing, Ìmmersive virtual reality simulation with facilitator-guided debriefing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A pilot study of a virtual reality-based simulation platform for Neonatal Resuscitation Program training.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Virtual simulations for neonatal education.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rachel Umoren *Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA rumoren@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-9278
Sherri Bucher *Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Daniel S HippeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Beatrice Nkolika EzenwaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Iretiola Bamikeolu FajoluDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Felicitas M OkwakoAlupe University College, Busia, Kenya.
John FeltnerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mary NafulaAlupe University College, Busia, Kenya.
Annet MusaleAlupe University College, Busia, Kenya.
Olubukola A OlawuyiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Christianah O AdeboboyeDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ime AsangansieHealth4everyone, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chris PatonCentre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Oxford, UK.
Saptarshi PurkayasthaDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Chinyere Veronica Ezeaka *Department of Paediatrics, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.
Fabian Esamai *Alupe University College, Busia, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of mobile virtual reality (VR) simulations using electronic Helping Babies Breathe (eHBB) or video for the maintenance of neonatal resuscitation skills in healthcare workers in resource-scarce settings.

designRandomised controlled trial with 6-month follow-up (2018-2020).

settingSecondary and tertiary healthcare facilities.

participants274 nurses and midwives assigned to labour and delivery, operating room and newborn care units were recruited from 20 healthcare facilities in Nigeria and Kenya and randomised to one of three groups: VR (eHBB+digital guide), video (video+digital guide) or control (digital guide only) groups before an in-person HBB course.

interventionseHBB VR simulation or neonatal resuscitation video. MAIN OUTCOMES: Healthcare worker neonatal resuscitation skills using standardised checklists in a simulated setting at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months.

resultsNeonatal resuscitation skills pass rates were similar among the groups at 6-month follow-up for bag-and-mask ventilation (BMV) skills check (VR 28%, video 25%, control 22%, p=0.71), objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) A (VR 76%, video 76%, control 72%, p=0.78) and OSCE B (VR 62%, video 60%, control 49%, p=0.18). Relative to the immediate postcourse assessments, there was greater retention of BMV skills at 6 months in the VR group (-15% VR, p=0.10; -21% video, p<0.01, -27% control, p=0.001). OSCE B pass rates in the VR group were numerically higher at 3 months (+4%, p=0.64) and 6 months (+3%, p=0.74) and lower in the video (-21% at 3 months, p<0.001; -14% at 6 months, p=0.066) and control groups (-7% at 3 months, p=0.43; -14% at 6 months, p=0.10). On follow-up survey, 95% (n=65) of respondents in the VR group and 98% (n=82) in the video group would use their assigned intervention again.

conclusioneHBB VR training was highly acceptable to healthcare workers in low-income to middle-income countries and may provide additional support for neonatal resuscitation skills retention compared with other digital interventions.

Indexed as

Asphyxia NeonatorumVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceElectronicsHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornResuscitationeducation & training (see medical education & training)information technologymedical education & trainingneonatal intensive & critical careneonatologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34433598
PMCPMC8390148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.