Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433549›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2023

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: findings from the prospective, multicentre, AUSSIEDEX study.

Samantha Fraser-Bell, Hyong Kwon Kang, Paul Mitchell, Jennifer J Arnold, Jodi Tainton, Susan Simonyi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02731911 (Phase 4, Open-label, Non-randomized, Prospective Study of OZURDEX® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema - The AUSSIEDEX Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02731911 completednot on this map

Phase 4, Open-label, Non-randomized, Prospective Study of OZURDEX® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema - The AUSSIEDEX Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2016 to 2018Enrolled202ConditionsDiabetic Macular OedemaArmsdexamethasone intravitreal implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reply.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha Fraser-BellThe University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia samantha.fraser-bell@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-9359
Hyong Kwon KangRetina & Vitreous Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Paul MitchellSydney West Retina, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer J ArnoldMarsden Eye Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jodi TaintonAllergan Australia Pty Ltd, Gordon, New South Wales, Australia.
Susan SimonyiAllergan Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX; Ozurdex) monotherapy in the patient subgroup of the AUSSIEDEX study with treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DME).

methodsThe open-label, prospective, phase 4, real-world study included pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes scheduled for cataract surgery that were treatment-naïve or non-responsive to antivascular endothelial growth factors. No eyes were excluded based on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield retinal thickness (CRT). After the initial DEX injection at the baseline visit, reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. Week-16 and week-52 visits were mandatory. Primary endpoints were changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks.

resultsOf 200 eyes enrolled in the AUSSIEDEX study, 57 were treatment-naïve. Baseline mean BCVA was 58.8 letters and baseline mean CRT was 418.6 µm; changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks in this subgroup were 3.4 letters (p=0.042) and -89.6 µm (p<0.001), respectively, with a mean 2.5 injections. The change in mean CRT from baseline was -55.8 µm at week 16 (p<0.001). The most common adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP), with 20.0% of eyes requiring IOP-lowering medication. One patient was discontinued due to increased IOP. No eyes required filtration surgery. No serious, treatment-related ocular adverse events were reported.

conclusionIn this largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for DME to date, DEX significantly improved CRT and BCVA at 52 weeks in treatment-naïve eyes, without new safety concerns, supporting DEX use in treatment-naïve DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02731911.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsinflammationmacularetinatreatment Medicalvision

Identifiers

PMID34433549
PMCPMC9763166
OpenAlexW3195734854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.