ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2023
Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: findings from the prospective, multicentre, AUSSIEDEX study.
Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02731911 (Phase 4, Open-label, Non-randomized, Prospective Study of OZURDEX® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema - The AUSSIEDEX Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 4, Open-label, Non-randomized, Prospective Study of OZURDEX® in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema - The AUSSIEDEX Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reply.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Early Switch to Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Poorly Responding to Anti-VEGF Therapy: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Long-Term Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Monotherapy in Naïve Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Secondary ocular hypertension as an adverse effect of treatment with intravitreal dexamethasone implant: A retrospective Swedish cohort study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Assessment the real-world safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex): novel insights from a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis utilizing the FAERS database.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Dexamethasone implant in naive versus refractory patients with diabetic macular edema: a Meta-analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Role of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in the Management of Treatment-Naive Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pre-Cataract Surgical Approach for Patients with Systemic Contraindications to Anti-VEGF Therapy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex) and Brolucizumab Injection in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Hyperreflective Intraretinal Dots: A Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular oedema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the AUSSIEDEX study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX; Ozurdex) monotherapy in the patient subgroup of the AUSSIEDEX study with treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DME).
methodsThe open-label, prospective, phase 4, real-world study included pseudophakic eyes and phakic eyes scheduled for cataract surgery that were treatment-naïve or non-responsive to antivascular endothelial growth factors. No eyes were excluded based on baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or central subfield retinal thickness (CRT). After the initial DEX injection at the baseline visit, reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. Week-16 and week-52 visits were mandatory. Primary endpoints were changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks.
resultsOf 200 eyes enrolled in the AUSSIEDEX study, 57 were treatment-naïve. Baseline mean BCVA was 58.8 letters and baseline mean CRT was 418.6 µm; changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to 52 weeks in this subgroup were 3.4 letters (p=0.042) and -89.6 µm (p<0.001), respectively, with a mean 2.5 injections. The change in mean CRT from baseline was -55.8 µm at week 16 (p<0.001). The most common adverse event was increased intraocular pressure (IOP), with 20.0% of eyes requiring IOP-lowering medication. One patient was discontinued due to increased IOP. No eyes required filtration surgery. No serious, treatment-related ocular adverse events were reported.
conclusionIn this largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for DME to date, DEX significantly improved CRT and BCVA at 52 weeks in treatment-naïve eyes, without new safety concerns, supporting DEX use in treatment-naïve DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02731911.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.