ArticleBMC medical genomics2021
Robust biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma from high-throughput data by multiple feature selection methods.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- CPSM: an R package for cancer patient survival risk model using transcriptomics and clinical data.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Identification of protein biomarkers to differentiate between gram-negative and gram-positive infections in adults suspected of sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Integrating AI and RNA biomarkers in cancer: advances in diagnostics and targeted therapies.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Metabolic profile changes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis detected using mass spectrometry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial non-coding RNAs as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in lung cancer integration of traditional bioinformatics and machine learning approaches.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Oviduct Glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) Diagnoses Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Biosensing: Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Pioneering noninvasive colorectal cancer detection with an AI-enhanced breath volatilomics platform.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Multiomic Investigations into Lung Health and Disease.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Review
- Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A machine learning-based SNP-set analysis approach for identifying disease-associated susceptibility loci.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Stacking Ensemble Method for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prediction in Chinese Pregnant Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Identification of potential biomarkers in ovarian carcinoma and an evaluation of their prognostic value.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers. The discovery of specific genes severing as biomarkers is of paramount significance for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The high-throughput omics data generated by the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) consortium provides a valuable resource for the discovery of HCC biomarker genes. Numerous methods have been proposed to select cancer biomarkers. However, these methods have not investigated the robustness of identification with different feature selection techniques.
methodsWe use six different recursive feature elimination methods to select the gene signiatures of HCC from TCGA liver cancer data. The genes shared in the six selected subsets are proposed as robust biomarkers. Akaike information criterion (AIC) is employed to explain the optimization process of feature selection, which provides a statistical interpretation for the feature selection in machine learning methods. And we use several methods to validate the screened biomarkers.
resultsIn this paper, we propose a robust method for discovering biomarker genes for HCC from gene expression data. Specifically, we implement recursive feature elimination cross-validation (RFE-CV) methods based on six different classication algorithms. The overlaps in the discovered gene sets via different methods are referred as the identified biomarkers. We give an interpretation of the feature selection process based on machine learning using AIC in statistics. Furthermore, the features selected by the backward logistic stepwise regression via AIC minimum theory are completely contained in the identified biomarkers. Through the classification results, the superiority of interpretable robust biomarker discovery method is verified.
conclusionsIt is found that overlaps among gene subsets contain different quantitative features selected by the RFE-CV of 6 classifiers. The AIC values in the model selection provide a theoretical foundation for the feature selection process of biomarker discovery via machine learning. What's more, genes containing in more optimally selected subsets make better biological sense and implication. The quality of feature selection is improved by the intersections of biomarkers selected from different classifiers. This is a general method suitable for screening biomarkers of complex diseases from high-throughput data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.