Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433414›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

TLGP: a flexible transfer learning algorithm for gene prioritization based on heterogeneous source domain.

Yan Wang, Zuheng Xia, Jingjing Deng, Xianghua Xie, Maoguo Gong, Xiaoke Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan Wang *School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, South TaiBai Road, Xi'an, China.
Zuheng Xia *School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, South TaiBai Road, Xi'an, China.
Jingjing DengDepartment of Computer Science, Swansea University, Bay, UK.
Xianghua XieDepartment of Computer Science, Swansea University, Bay, UK.
Maoguo GongSchool of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, South TaiBai Road, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoke MaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, South TaiBai Road, Xi'an, China. xkma@xidian.edu.cn.

Funding

National Aerospace Science Foundation of China 61772394Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Shaanxi Province 2018003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene prioritization (gene ranking) aims to obtain the centrality of genes, which is critical for cancer diagnosis and therapy since keys genes correspond to the biomarkers or targets of drugs. Great efforts have been devoted to the gene ranking problem by exploring the similarity between candidate and known disease-causing genes. However, when the number of disease-causing genes is limited, they are not applicable largely due to the low accuracy. Actually, the number of disease-causing genes for cancers, particularly for these rare cancers, are really limited. Therefore, there is a critical needed to design effective and efficient algorithms for gene ranking with limited prior disease-causing genes.

resultsIn this study, we propose a transfer learning based algorithm for gene prioritization (called TLGP) in the cancer (target domain) without disease-causing genes by transferring knowledge from other cancers (source domain). The underlying assumption is that knowledge shared by similar cancers improves the accuracy of gene prioritization. Specifically, TLGP first quantifies the similarity between the target and source domain by calculating the affinity matrix for genes. Then, TLGP automatically learns a fusion network for the target cancer by fusing affinity matrix, pathogenic genes and genomic data of source cancers. Finally, genes in the target cancer are prioritized. The experimental results indicate that the learnt fusion network is more reliable than gene co-expression network, implying that transferring knowledge from other cancers improves the accuracy of network construction. Moreover, TLGP outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of accuracy, improving at least 5%.

conclusionThe proposed model and method provide an effective and efficient strategy for gene ranking by integrating genomic data from various cancers.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNeoplasmsAlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMachine LearningGene co-expression networkGene prioritizatioIntegrative analysisTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34433414
PMCPMC8386056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.