Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433408›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Web-based LinRegPCR: application for the visualization and analysis of (RT)-qPCR amplification and melting data.

Andreas Untergasser, Jan M Ruijter, Vladimir Benes, Maurice J B van den Hoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Seasonality ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cells · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Acetate Metabolism in Thyroid Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas UntergasserCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. andreas@untergasser.de.
Jan M RuijterDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vladimir BenesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genomics Core Facility, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maurice J B van den HoffDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.j.vandenhoff@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-8055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analyses of amplification and melting curves have been shown to provide valuable information on the quality of the individual reactions in quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiments and to result in more reliable and reproducible quantitative results. IMPLEMENTATION: The main steps in the amplification curve analysis are (1) a unique baseline subtraction, not using the ground phase cycles, (2) PCR efficiency determination from the exponential phase of the individual reactions, (3) setting a common quantification threshold and (4) calculation of the efficiency-corrected target quantity with the common threshold, efficiency per assay and C

resultsThe LinRegPCR web application provides visualization and analysis of a single qPCR run. The user interface displays the analysis results on the amplification curve analysis and melting curve analysis in tables and graphs in which deviant reactions are highlighted. The annotated results in the tables can be exported for calculation of gene-expression ratios, fold-change between experimental conditions and further statistical analysis. Web-based LinRegPCR addresses two types of users, wet-lab scientists analyzing the amplification and melting curves of their own qPCR experiments and bioinformaticians creating pipelines for analysis of series of qPCR experiments by splitting its functionality into a stand-alone back-end RDML (Real-time PCR Data Markup Language) Python library and several companion applications for data visualization, analysis and interactive access. The use of the RDML data standard enables machine independent storage and exchange of qPCR data and the RDML-Tools assist with the import of qPCR data from the files exported by the qPCR instrument.

conclusionsThe combined implementation of these analyses in the newly developed web-based LinRegPCR ( https://www.gear-genomics.com/rdml-tools/ ) is platform independent and much faster than the original Windows-based versions of the LinRegPCR program. Moreover, web-based LinRegPCR includes a novel statistical outlier detection and the combination of amplification and melting curve analyses allows direct validation of the amplification product and reporting of reactions that amplify artefacts.

Indexed as

ArtifactsInternetReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAmplification curveLinRegPCRMelting curvePCRqPCRRDML

Identifiers

PMID34433408
PMCPMC8386043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.