Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433286›Full record

SynthesisAssessment2023

A Systematic Review of Parenting Scales Measurement Invariance/ Equivalence of by Race and Ethnicity: Recommendations for Inclusive Parenting Research.

Violeta J Rodriguez, Dominique L La Barrie, Miriam C Zegarac, Anne Shaffer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Assessment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advantages in Bayesian Approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Measuring Parental School Involvement: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Revision of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in an ethnoracially diverse national sample.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Assessing parenting in racially and ethnically diverse families: A lack of measurement equivalence.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2023
    Article
  16. Measurement invariance in the assessment of parenting practices: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Violeta J RodriguezUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-2061
Dominique L La BarrieUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Miriam C ZegaracUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Anne ShafferUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-8724

Funding

Revision and Validation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse National SampleR36MH127838 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI RODRIGUEZ, VIOLETA DE JESUS · 2021 to 2022
$86k
NIMH NIH HHS R36 MH127838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities in the development and validation of parenting measures limits our understanding of whether parenting constructs are valid in racial and ethnic minorities. Tests of measurement invariance/equivalence (MI/E) of parenting measures can help evaluate the validity of parenting constructs among racial/ethnic minorities. This systematic review summarized studies on MI/E of parenting constructs by race/ethnicity and evaluated the strength of the evidence. A literature search was conducted using various databases and references to retrieve studies from the United States. Indeed, 10 studies were identified that tested for MI/E of eight parenting scales by race/ethnicity. Only one scale showed moderate evidence of MI/E, five showed weak evidence of MI/E, and two showed no evidence of MI/E. Most studies (80%) used factor analytic methods to test for MI/E, but only two studies (20%) examined all levels of invariance. These findings show that differences exist in how racial/ethnic minorities perceive parenting constructs. Further research is needed to develop more inclusive parenting measures, to protect against the ways in which biased measures may pathologize or misrepresent parenting practices among racial/ethnic minorities.

Indexed as

EthnicityParentingHumansUnited Statesitem response theorymeasure developmentmeasurement invarianceparentingpsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID34433286
PMCPMC10314998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.