Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34433090›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2021

Molecular insights into the biased signaling mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor.

Xiaojing Cong, Damien Maurel, Hélène Déméné, Ieva Vasiliauskaité-Brooks, Joanna Hagelberger, Fanny Peysson, Julie Saint-Paul, Jérôme Golebiowski, Sébastien Granier, Rémy Sounier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structure-Bias Relationship of μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biased signalingActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Visualizing agonist-induced M2 receptor activation regulated by aromatic ring dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xiaojing CongInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Damien MaurelInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Hélène DéménéCentre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048-INSERM 1054, University of Montpellier, 29 rue de Navacelles, 34090 Montpellier Cedex, France.
Ieva Vasiliauskaité-BrooksInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Joanna HagelbergerInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Fanny PeyssonInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Julie Saint-PaulInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Jérôme GolebiowskiUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Institute of Chemistry of Nice UMR7272, 06108 Nice, France; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu 711-873, South Korea.
Sébastien GranierInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France. Electronic address: sebastien.granier@igf.cnrs.fr.
Rémy SounierInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR-5203 INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France. Electronic address: remy.sounier@igf.cnrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Structural Basis of Opioid Receptor FunctionR37DA036246 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KOBILKA, BRIAN K · 2013 to 2020
$4.2M
The structural basis for pathway-selective signaling by the µ opioid receptorR01DA036246 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Brian K Kobilka · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036246NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA036246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GPCR functional selectivity opens new opportunities for the design of safer drugs. Ligands orchestrate GPCR signaling cascades by modulating the receptor conformational landscape. Our study provides insights into the dynamic mechanism enabling opioid ligands to preferentially activate the G protein over the β-arrestin pathways through the μ-opioid receptor (μOR). We combine functional assays in living cells, solution NMR spectroscopy, and enhanced-sampling molecular dynamic simulations to identify the specific μOR conformations induced by G protein-biased agonists. In particular, we describe the dynamic and allosteric communications between the ligand-binding pocket and the receptor intracellular domains, through conserved motifs in class A GPCRs. Most strikingly, the biased agonists trigger μOR conformational changes in the intracellular loop 1 and helix 8 domains, which may impair β-arrestin binding or signaling. The findings may apply to other GPCR families and provide key molecular information that could facilitate the design of biased ligands.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMolecular Dynamics SimulationAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsbeta-ArrestinsBinding SitesComputer-Aided DesignDrug DesignDrug Partial AgonismHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMiceProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein StabilityAnalgesics, Opioidbeta-ArrestinsLigandsReceptors, Opioid, mubiased agonismGPCRmolecular dynamicsNMRopioid

Identifiers

PMID34433090
PMCPMC8541911
OpenAlexW3193967080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.