Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34432821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Ventilator output splitting interface 'ACRA': Description and evaluation in lung simulators and in an experimental ARDS animal model.

Pablo E Otero, Lisa Tarragona, Andrea S Zaccagnini, Natali Verdier, Martin R Ceballos, Emiliano Gogniat, Juan M Cabaleiro, Juan D'Adamo, Thomas Duriez, Pedro Garcia Eijo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo E OteroCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-7269
Lisa TarragonaCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrea S ZaccagniniCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Natali VerdierCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin R CeballosCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Emiliano GogniatCapítulo de Kinesiología Intensivista, Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan M CabaleiroLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4127-0085
Juan D'AdamoLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Thomas DuriezLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pedro Garcia EijoLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillermo ArtanaLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-0126
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic has led the world to an unprecedented global shortage of ventilators, and its sharing has been proposed as an alternative to meet the surge. This study outlines the performance of a preformed novel interface called 'ACRA', designed to split ventilator outflow into two breathing systems. The 'ACRA' interface was built using medical use approved components. It consists of four unidirectional valves, two adjustable flow-restrictor valves placed on the inspiratory limbs of each unit, and one adjustable PEEP valve placed on the expiratory limb of the unit that would require a greater PEEP. The interface was interposed between a ventilator and two lung units (phase I), two breathing simulators (phase II) and two live pigs with heterogeneous lung conditions (phase III). The interface and ventilator adjustments tested the ability to regulate individual pressures and the resulting tidal volumes. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon tests test (p < 0.05). Ventilator outflow splitting, independent pressure adjustments and individual tidal volume monitoring were feasible in all phases. In all experimental measurements, dual ventilation allowed for individual and tight adjustments of the pressure, and thus volume delivered to each paired lung unit without affecting the other unit's ventilation-all the modifications performed on the ventilator equally affected both paired lung units. Although only suggested during a dire crisis, this experiment supports dual ventilation as an alternative worth to be considered.

Indexed as

Ventilators, MechanicalAnimalsBlood PressureCarbon DioxideComputer SimulationDisease Models, AnimalHeart RateHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLungRespiratory Distress SyndromeSwineTidal VolumeCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID34432821
PMCPMC8386869
OpenAlexW3193582080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.