ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2021
Integrating Thermal Analysis and Reaction Modeling for Rational Design of Pyrolytic Processes to Remediate Soils Contaminated with Heavy Crude Oil.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a novel methodology that combines thermo-analytical measurements and mathematical methods to inform the reliable pyrolytic treatment of specific soil/contaminant systems. Our approach improves upon current "black-box" design methods that may overestimate the required treatment intensity and hinder cost efficacy. We used thermogravimetry and evolved gas analysis to characterize the complex network of soil mineral transformations, contaminant desorption, and pyrolytic reactions occurring when contaminated soils are heated in an anoxic atmosphere. The kinetics of these reactions were quantified using a distributed activation energy (DAE) approach with six pseudocomponents and used in a mathematical model for continuous-flow reactors to predict the removal of hydrocarbon contaminants without other fitting parameters. This model was tested with pilot-scale data from pyrolytic treatment of soils contaminated with crude oil and found to be a good predictor of the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removal for temperatures between 370 and 470 °C and residence times from 15 to 60 min. The light hydrocarbon fraction desorbed quickly, and over 99.7% removal was achieved at 420 °C and 15 min residence time. However, 95% removal of the heavy hydrocarbon fraction, which is a good proxy for polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), required 470 °C with 15 min residence time. This model can be employed to select operating conditions (e.g., reactor size, treatment time, and temperature) to reliably achieve remediation objectives for specific hydrocarbon/soil mixtures without inflating energy requirements, which would lower operating costs and decrease the process carbon footprint on a system-specific basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.