Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34432096›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Incidence and local risk factors of infection after anterior sub-axial cervical spine surgery: retrospective database analysis of 4897 consecutive procedures.

Mohamed Alhashash, Mahmoud Alkharsawi, Mootaz Shousha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multiclass classification of infections after cervical spine surgery in the elderly: a machine learning approach based on preoperative and perioperative data.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed AlhashashDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany. hashmf1@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7592-1419
Mahmoud AlkharsawiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany.
Mootaz ShoushaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe anterior cervical spine approach is safe and effective in many cervical spine pathologies. It is considered one of the most common approaches in spine surgery. Postoperative infections after anterior cervical surgery are rare but serious. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study is a retrospective database analysis. In this study, the incidence, and the local risk factors of postoperative infection after anterior-only sub-axial cervical spine surgery in a high-volume spine center were analyzed. The data of patients operated in a teaching hospital is electronically stored in a comprehensive medical database program. Postoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery from C2 to C7 was calculated and analyzed. In the study period, 4897 patients were operated. Twenty-four infections after a primary aseptic operation were detected. Independent local risk factors were estimated.

resultsPostoperative infection occurred in 24/4897 patients (0.49%). The incidence of infection after cervical trauma was 3% (7/229), after spinal cord injury 4.3% (2/46), with myelopathy 1.98% (11/556), and after revision surgery 1.25% (7/560). The incidence showed a significant increase (p = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02). In 14 of the postoperatively infected patients (58.3%) an oesophageal injury was diagnosed. Odds ratios (OR) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% was calculated. Independent risk factors for the postoperative infections were: Cervical trauma (OR 8.59, 95% CI 3.52-20.93), revision surgery (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.33-7.82), The presence of cervical myelopathy (OR 6.71, 95% CI 2.99-15.06), and spinal cord injury (OR 9.33, 95% CI 2.13-40.83).

conclusionsPostoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery is low (0.49%). In addition to the general risk factor for infection, the local risk factors are trauma, myelopathy, spinal cord injury, and revision surgeries. In the case of postoperative infection, an oesophageal injury should be excluded.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord DiseasesSpinal Cord InjuriesCervical VertebraeHumansIncidencePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnterior approachCervical spineOesophageal injuryPostoperative infectionRevisionRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.