Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34432072›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Prophylactic fasciotomy in tibial osteotomies: functional results].

Nikolaus Degen, Tobias Randeu, Florian Wolf, Julian Fürmetz, Ekkehard Euler, Wolfgang Böcker, Peter Helmut Thaller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Intramedullary limb lengthening and bone segment transport].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Avoiding Compartment Syndrome, Vascular Injury, and Neurologic Deficit in Tibial Osteotomy: An Observational Study of 108 Limbs.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaus Degen3D-Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland. ndegen@med.lmu.de.
Tobias Randeu3D-Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Florian Wolf3D-Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Julian Fürmetz3D-Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Ekkehard EulerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Wolfgang BöckerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Peter Helmut Thaller3D-Chirurgie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntramedullary nailing in tibial osteotomy (TO) can be combined with minimally invasive prophylactic fasciotomy (PF) of the anterior compartment of the lower leg to prevent postoperative acute compartment syndrome (CS). So far no studies are available on the effects of TO or PF on specific functions of the extensor muscles.

objectiveTo investigate the medium-term outcome after PF in TO in patients without preoperative functional impairment. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn 41 cases (28 women, 13 men) the patients were questioned with respect to clinical function on average 6.1 years after elective TO and PF fixed with intramedullary nails. Of the cases 23 were examined measuring isometric strength and range of motion (ROM) of dorsiflexion (DF) of the foot. Strength was compared to the 10% standard percentile to test for clinical relevance and to the contralateral side if applicable.

resultsIn an average of 86% of the cases no or minor functional impairment of the extensors was reported. The DF of the foot was rated as the leading impairment. Mean strength did not differ significantly from the gender-specific 10% standard percentiles but was significantly lower on the operated side with 16.0 ± 6.5 kgf compared to the healthy side with 17.5 ± 6.3 kgf (p < 0.01). Subjective impairments of DF of the foot correlated clearly negatively with ROM (r

conclusionThe results indicate a low occurrence of subjectively relevant functional impairment of the extensor muscles. The decrease of strength was not found to be clinically relevant. Subjective impairments appeared to be caused by a decrease of ROM, not strength.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryTibial FracturesFasciotomyFemaleHumansMaleOsteotomyRange of Motion, ArticularCompartment syndromeIntramedullary nailingLeg length discrepancyRange of motionStrength

Identifiers

PMID34432072
PMCPMC9411082
OpenAlexW3195657039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.