Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431974›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021

Dysbiosis in the Gut Microbiome in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes Rats and Follow-Up During Retinal Changes.

Shalem Raj Padakandla, Taraprasad Das, Gumpili Sai Prashanthi, Kiran Kumar Angadi, S Sreenivasa Reddy, G Bhanuprakash Reddy, Sisinthy Shivaji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Effect of Benaglutide on Gut Microbiota and Fecal Metabolites in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Article
  5. Evidence Suggesting the Role of Gut Dysbiosis in Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shalem Raj PadakandlaProf Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Taraprasad DasSmt. Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreo Retinal Diseases, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Gumpili Sai PrashanthiProf Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Kiran Kumar AngadiBiochemistry Division, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
S Sreenivasa ReddyBiochemistry Division, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
G Bhanuprakash ReddyBiochemistry Division, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sisinthy ShivajiProf Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INNational Institute of Nutrition · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the gut bacterial microbiome of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and rats with retinal changes. Methods: Induction of diabetes was confirmed by an increase in blood sugar (>150 mg/dL), and the progression of diabetes with retinal changes was assessed by histology and immunohistochemistry of retinal sections. Microbiomes were generated using fecal DNA, and the V3-V4 amplicons were sequenced and analyzed by QIIME and R. Results: Dysbiosis in the gut microbiome of diabetic rats and diabetic rats with retinal changes was observed at the phylum and genus levels compared with the control rats. Heat-map analysis based on the differentially abundant genera indicated that the microbiomes of controls and diabetic rats separated into two distinct clusters. The majority of the microbiomes in diabetic rats with retinal changes also formed a distinct cluster from the control rats. β-diversity analysis separated the microbiome of control rats from the microbiome of diabetic rats and diabetic rats with retinal changes, but the microbiomes of diabetic rats and diabetic rats with retinal changes showed an overlap. Functional analysis indicated that the enhanced inflammation in diabetic rats showing retinal changes could be ascribed to a decrease in anti-inflammatory bacteria and an increase in pathogenic and proinflammatory bacteria. Conclusions: This study showed that the gut bacterial microbiome in diabetic rats with retinal changes was different compared with control rats. The results could help develop novel therapeutics for diabetics and diabetic individuals with retinal changes.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDysbiosisFecesFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRats

Identifiers

PMID34431974
PMCPMC8399471
OpenAlexW3194512886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.