Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431694›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

Optogenetic Tools for Control of Public Goods in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Neydis Moreno Morales, Michael T Patel, Cameron J Stewart, Kieran Sweeney, Megan N McClean

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Optogenetics in oral and craniofacial research.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Expanding the molecular versatility of an optogenetic switch in yeast.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  13. Platforms for Optogenetic Stimulation and Feedback Control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neydis Moreno MoralesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Michael T Patel *Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrated Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Cameron J Stewart *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Kieran SweeneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Megan N McCleanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Elucidating the network design principles of biological signal processingR35GM128873 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Megan N McClean · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms live in dense and diverse communities, with interactions between cells guiding community development and phenotype. The ability to perturb specific intercellular interactions in space and time provides a powerful route to determining the critical interactions and design rules for microbial communities. Approaches using optogenetic tools to modulate these interactions offer promise, as light can be exquisitely controlled in space and time. We report new plasmids for rapid integration of an optogenetic system into Saccharomyces cerevisiae to engineer light control of expression of a gene of interest. In a proof-of-principle study, we demonstrate the ability to control a model cooperative interaction, namely, the expression of the enzyme invertase (SUC2) which allows S. cerevisiae to hydrolyze sucrose and utilize it as a carbon source. We demonstrate that the strength of this cooperative interaction can be tuned in space and time by modulating light intensity and through spatial control of illumination. Spatial control of light allows cooperators and cheaters to be spatially segregated, and we show that the interplay between cooperative and inhibitory interactions in space can lead to pattern formation. Our strategy can be applied to achieve spatiotemporal control of expression of a gene of interest in S. cerevisiae to perturb both intercellular and interspecies interactions.

Indexed as

Lightbeta-FructofuranosidaseGene Expression Regulation, FungalOptogeneticsPlasmidsProof of Concept StudySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSucrosebeta-FructofuranosidaseSucroseinvertasemicrobial communitiesoptogeneticspublic goodsSaccharomycessynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID34431694
PMCPMC8386412
OpenAlexW3196076009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.