Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431607›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2021

Trends in inflammatory bowel disease treatment in the past two decades-a high-level text mining analysis of PubMed publications.

Eyal Klang, Yiftach Barash, Shelly Soffer, Eyal Shachar, Adi Lahat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Trends and demographic patterns in biologic and corticosteroid prescriptions for inflammatory bowel disease: findings from electronic medical records, 2011-2020.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eyal KlangDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4567-3108
Yiftach BarashDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Shelly SofferDeepVision Lab, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7853-2029
Eyal ShacharSackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adi LahatSackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimMany therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) emerged during the last 2 decades, along with the rise in disease prevalence and incidence. We aimed at assessing the published literature on different treatment options in that period. Special attention was attributed to specific medication mechanisms and geographic diversity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe have queried PubMed for all available IBD-related entries published during 2000-2020. The following data were extracted for each entry: PubMed unique article ID (PMID), title, publishing journal, abstract text, keywords (if any), and authors' affiliations. Two gastrointestinal specialists decided in consensus on a list of terms to classify entries. The terms belonged to five treatment groups: medical, surgical, dietary, microbiome manipulation, and complementary medicine. The medical and complementary medicine groups were further sub-classified. Annual trends of publications for the years 2000-2020 were plotted for different treatment types. The slopes of publication trends were calculated by fitting regression lines to the annual number of publications.

resultsOverall, 77,505 IBD entries were published between 2000 and 2020. Medical treatment showed the highest number of total publications 21,540/77,505 (27.8%), followed by surgical 7605/77,505 (9.8%), microbiome research 5260/77,505 (6.8%), dietary 4819/77,505 (6.2%), and complementary medicine treatment 762/77,505 (1.0%). Interestingly, since 2012 there is a steep rise in microbiome publications that outnumbered surgery in the last 2 years. Trend analysis of medical treatment showed that biologics had the steepest slope (57.5, p < 0.001), followed by immunomodulators (4.9, p < 0.001), small molecules (3.9, p < 0.001), and 5-ASA (3.8, p < 0.001).

conclusionAccording to our high-level publications trend analysis, the past 2 decades certainly deserve the reference as the "biologic era", as publications regarding biological therapy outnumbered all other treatment options. Interestingly, though very popular among patients, complementary medicine was not studied with correlation to its' acceptance among patients.

Indexed as

PubMedBiological ProductsComplementary TherapiesData MiningDietFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansIncidenceInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMicrobiotaPrevalenceProbioticsBiological Productscomplementary therapiesCrohn diseasedrug therapyinflammatory bowel diseasemicrobiomenutritionsurgeryulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID34431607
PMCPMC8598961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.