Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431553›Full record

ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2022

Human body donation: How informed are the donors?

Jeffrey A Zealley, Dana Howard, Courtney Thiele, Joy Y Balta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Anatomy engagement and science communication.Anatomical sciences education · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Human body donation: How informed are the donors?Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey A ZealleyDivision of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Dana HowardDivision of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Courtney ThieleDivision of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Joy Y BaltaDivision of Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-3731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deceased human bodies are donated for education and research. Informed consent has become the standard for research on the living. A question could be asked on how informed are the donors and their families about the process before this generous gift is given. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the published donation forms used by body donation programs in the United States and assess them according to the guidelines published by the American Association of Clinical Anatomists. The findings of this study shows that the level of information given to donors and families, before consenting to whole body donation, varies greatly throughout the United States. Many of the forms fail to include the recommendations made by professional societies. Additional information needs to be added to whole body donation forms to better inform donors and families about the donation process, what happens to the body, and the final disposition of the bodies once studies are completed. Overall, it was concluded that in some cases consent is being obtained but much more needs to be done before institutions can claim to obtain informed consent.

Indexed as

AnatomistsTissue and Organ ProcurementHuman BodyHumansInformed ConsentTissue DonorsUnited Statesanatomybody donationeducationinformed consentresearch

Identifiers

PMID34431553
PMCPMC9292013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.