Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431248›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2021

Deep Learning Algorithm for Simultaneous Noise Reduction and Edge Sharpening in Low-Dose CT Images: A Pilot Study Using Lumbar Spine CT.

Hyunjung Yeoh, Sung Hwan Hong, Chulkyun Ahn, Ja-Young Choi, Hee-Dong Chae, Hye Jin Yoo, Jong Hyo Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. 4DCT is long overdue for improvement.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyunjung YeohDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-9022
Sung Hwan HongDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. drhong@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-2302-1341
Chulkyun AhnDepartment of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-4892
Ja-Young ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-0629
Hee-Dong ChaeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2624-1606
Hye Jin YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-7870
Jong Hyo KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5695-4976
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI20C2092Korea Medical Device Development Fund 9991007051Korea Medical Device Development Fund KMDF_PR_20200901_0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess whether a deep learning (DL) algorithm could enable simultaneous noise reduction and edge sharpening in low-dose lumbar spine CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 52 patients (26 male and 26 female; median age, 60.5 years) who had undergone CT-guided lumbar bone biopsy between October 2015 and April 2020. Initial 100-mAs survey images and 50-mAs intraprocedural images were reconstructed by filtered back projection. Denoising was performed using a vendor-agnostic DL model (ClariCT.AI™, ClariPI) for the 50-mAS images, and the 50-mAs, denoised 50-mAs, and 100-mAs CT images were compared. Noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and edge rise distance (ERD) for image sharpness were measured. The data were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation for these parameters. Two musculoskeletal radiologists assessed the visibility of the normal anatomical structures.

resultsNoise was lower in the denoised 50-mAs images (36.38 ± 7.03 Hounsfield unit [HU]) than the 50-mAs (93.33 ± 25.36 HU) and 100-mAs (63.33 ± 16.09 HU) images (

conclusionDL-based reconstruction may enable simultaneous noise reduction and improvement in image quality with the preservation of edge sharpness on low-dose lumbar spine CT. Investigations on further radiation dose reduction and the clinical applicability of this technique are warranted.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyDLLumbar spineNoise reduction

Identifiers

PMID34431248
PMCPMC8546130
OpenAlexW3195584629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.