Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431002›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Anaphylactic reactions to local anesthetics in dental practice: a nationwide French retrospective study.

E Hascoët, J Mahé, H Meillard, H Théophile, A Cloitre, P Lesclous

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of Fatal Anaphylaxis: A Systematic Review.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: National Database Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E HascoëtInserm, UMR 1229, RMeS, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Université de Nantes, UFR Odontologie, CHU de Nantes, Unité Fonctionnelle de Chirurgie Orale, PHU4 OTONN, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
J MahéService de Pharmacologie Clinique, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
H MeillardInserm, UMR 1229, RMeS, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Université de Nantes, UFR Odontologie, CHU de Nantes, Unité Fonctionnelle de Chirurgie Orale, PHU4 OTONN, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
H ThéophilePôle de Santé Publique, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Centre Régional de Phramacovigilance de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
A CloitreInserm, UMR 1229, RMeS, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Université de Nantes, UFR Odontologie, CHU de Nantes, Unité Fonctionnelle de Chirurgie Orale, PHU4 OTONN, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
P LesclousInserm, UMR 1229, RMeS, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, Université de Nantes, UFR Odontologie, CHU de Nantes, Unité Fonctionnelle de Chirurgie Orale, PHU4 OTONN, ONIRIS, Nantes, France. philippe.lesclous@univ-nantes.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInserm · FRNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe primary aims of the present study were (1) to quantify and characterize anaphylactic type I reactions related to local anesthetics (LAs) drawing on the French Pharmacovigilance Database System over a 35-year period and (2) to focuse on reactions associated with dental procedures. The secondary aim was to infer an incidence rate in dental practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll cases of anaphylactic reactions were selected using the algorithmic Standardized MeDRA Query "anaphylactic reaction." For each reaction, comprehensive data were collected, in particular the severity of symptoms, risk factors for anaphylaxis, and allergy testing. Imputability was assessed and a crude incidence rate in dental practice was estimated.

resultsThe first-line search identified 416 anaphylactic reactions, mostly of grade II (138) or III (240) severity. When restricted to dental practice, this number fell to 26 (grade I: 4; grade II: 10; grade III: 11; and grade IV: 1). Lidocaine was most often involved (81.49%) and mostly associated with anaphylactic reactions of grade II and III. Overall, 11 cases of fatal anaphylaxis were recorded, but no in dental practice. In dental practice, lidocaine was also the most frequently involved LA (57.69%).

conclusionsAll these findings highlight the very low incidence of type I-IgE-mediated reactions to LA, particularly in dental practice. The incidence rate of LA anaphylctic episodes in dental practice was estimated as 0.0261 anaphylactic episodes per million LA cartridges. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: True anaphylactic reactions to LAs do occur and may justify a thorough investigation in dental practice.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAnesthetics, LocalHumansIncidenceLidocaineRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineAnaphylaxisDental careLocal anestheticsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34431002
OpenAlexW3196104337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.