Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34431001›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2022

Effect of 24% EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial.

Bartłomiej Górski, Marcin Szerszeń, Tomasz Kaczyński

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03354104 (Tunnel Technique With Emdogain® in Addition to Connective Tissue Graft Compared With Connective Tissue Graft Alone for the Treatment of Gingival), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03354104 naunknown statusnot on this map

Tunnel Technique With Emdogain® in Addition to Connective Tissue Graft Compared With Connective Tissue Graft Alone for the Treatment of Gingival (Periodontal?) Recessions: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2018 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsGingival RecessionArmsThe tunnel technique for root coverage with Emdogain, The tunnel technique for root coverage without Emdogain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cyotoxicity of Etidronate as an Endodontic Chelator Against Periodontal Ligament Fibroblast.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bone Remodeling during Orthodontic Movement of Lower Incisors-Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartłomiej GórskiDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Stanisława Binieckiego St 6, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. bartek_g3@tlen.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-4332
Marcin SzerszeńDepartment of Dental Prosthetics, Medical University of Warsaw, Stanisława Binieckiego St 6, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Tomasz KaczyńskiDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Stanisława Binieckiego St 6, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate effects of root conditioning with 24% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the 12-month outcomes after treatment of multiple gingival recessions (GR) with modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty patients with 142 GR were treated (72 test sites: SCTG + EDTA and 70 control sites: SCTG). Average and complete root coverage (ARC, CRC), gain in keratinized tissue width (KTW), gain in gingival thickness (GT), root esthetic coverage score (RES), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated at 12 months post-operatively.

resultsDifferences between pre- and post-operative values were statistically significant only within but not between treatment modalities. At 12 months, ARC was 86.0% for SCTG + EDTA-treated and 84.6 for SCTG-treated defects (p = 0.6636). CRC was observed in 90.2% (tests) and 91.4% (controls) of all cases (p = 0.9903). Professional assessment of esthetic outcomes using RES showed highly positive results reaching the value of 8.9 in case of test sites and 8.7 for control sites (p = 0.3358). Severity of pain and swelling did not differ between sites, regardless of whether EDTA was used.

conclusionsTest and control sites presented similarly positive outcomes related to root coverage, periodontal and esthetic parameters, and patient satisfaction and self-reported morbidity with no statistical differences between them 12 months after surgery. No significant differences in evaluated variables were observed between sites treated with and without 24% EDTA. Clinical relevance Considering the limitations of the present study, the use of 24% EDTA for root conditioning did not improve 12-month outcomes after treatment of multiple RT1 and RT2 gingival recessions with MCAT and SCTG. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03354104.

Indexed as

Gingival RecessionConnective TissueEdetic AcidEsthetics, DentalGingivaHumansSurgical FlapsTooth RootTreatment OutcomeEdetic AcidEstheticsEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)Modified coronally advanced tunnel techniqueMultiple gingival recessionsSubepithelial connective tissue graft

Identifiers

PMID34431001
PMCPMC8816759
OpenAlexW3194844763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.