Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430885›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

YouTube Is a Poor-Quality Source for Patient Information on Rehabilitation and Return to Sports After Hip Arthroscopy.

Toufic R Jildeh, Muhammad J Abbas, Leena Abbas, Kenneth J Washington, Kelechi R Okoroha

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toufic R JildehDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Muhammad J AbbasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Leena AbbasUniversity of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Kenneth J WashingtonWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.
Kelechi R OkorohaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the information quality on YouTube regarding rehabilitation and return to sport (RTS) after hip arthroscopy.

methodsBy use of private browsing and predefined search terms, 217 unique videos regarding RTS and rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy were included and systematically reviewed. A total of 164 videos were included in the final analysis. Videos were scored using 4 scoring systems: (1)

resultsA large majority of the included videos provided substandard information quality, dependability, and precision. RTS videos that were uploaded by physicians had a significantly higher

conclusionsThe quality and reliability of video content on YouTube pertaining to rehabilitation and RTS after hip arthroscopy are generally poor. The educational content of YouTube videos produced by physicians is of significantly higher quality as compared with non-physicians, patient testimonials, and commercials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The quality of the information patients receive on rehabilitation and RTS after hip arthroscopy is important for successful outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID34430885
PMCPMC8365195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.