Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430884›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Decreased Colony-Forming Ability of Subacromial Bursa-Derived Cells During Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Daichi Morikawa, Matthew R LeVasseur, S Brandon Luczak, Michael R Mancini, Nicholas Bellas, Mary Beth R McCarthy, Mark P Cote, Daniel P Berthold, Lukas N Muench, Augustus D Mazzocca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daichi MorikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Matthew R LeVasseurDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
S Brandon LuczakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Michael R ManciniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Nicholas BellasDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Mary Beth R McCarthyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Mark P CoteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Daniel P BertholdDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Lukas N MuenchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Augustus D MazzoccaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the cellular viability and differentiation potential of subacromial bursa-derived cells (SBDCs) located over the rotator cuff muscle and tendon of patients undergoing primary versus revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

methodsSubacromial bursa was harvested from 18 primary (57.1 ± 4.6 years) and 12 revision ARCRs (57.3 ± 6.7 years). Bursa was collected from 2 sites (over rotator cuff tendon and muscle), digested with collagenase, and grown in culture. The number of nucleated cells, colony-forming units (CFUs), differentiation potential, and mesenchymal stem cell surface markers were compared in primary and revision cases.

resultsThere was no difference in the number of nucleated cells between primary and revision ARCR harvested from the subacromial bursa overlying the tendon (3019.3 ± 1420.6 cells/mg and 3541.7 ± 2244.2 cells/mg, respectively;

conclusionsSBDCs harvested over the rotator cuff muscle demonstrated significantly decreased colony-forming abilities in revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with primary repairs. However, the subacromial bursa retains its pluripotent differentiation potential for chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic lineages in the revision setting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The subacromial bursa may play a role in the healing response of the repaired rotator cuff. This capacity is not necessarily diminished in the revision setting and may be harnessed as an orthobiologic.

Identifiers

PMID34430884
PMCPMC8365201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.