Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34430860›Full record

ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2021

Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver (MCN-L): a rare presentation and review of the literature.

Sweta Soni, Puneet Pareek, Satya Narayan, Vaibhav Varshney

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Liver mucinous cystic neoplasm: a challenging diagnosis case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasm in a male patient: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sweta SoniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
Puneet PareekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
Satya NarayanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rajasthan, India.
Vaibhav VarshneyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver (MCN-L, (previously referred to as cystadenomas or cystadenocarcinoma) are rare cystic tumors that occur within the liver parenchyma, or less frequently, in the extrahepatic bile ducts. They are reported to account for <5% of all liver cysts. The differential diagnosis of MCN-L includes intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with cystic change, echinococcal cyst, and a simple cyst. Invasive MCNs can only be differentiated from non-invasive MCNs by microscopic evaluation for the presence of ovarian-type stroma. Intraoperative biopsy and frozen section(s) are essential to differentiate MCNs from other cystic liver lesions. The treatment of choice is complete excision and can result in excellent survival with initial correct diagnosis. But its rare presentation and insufficient recognition frequently lead to an incorrect initial or delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis.

Indexed as

cystadenomadifferential diagnosislivermucinous cystic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34430860
PMCPMC8357353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.